TRB vs Carney on the Big Bank Tax

John Carney seems like a good bloke.  I get the feeling that should he and I ever go out for a night of drinking, much of Manhattan would end up looking like the aftermath of Cloverfield and at least one of us would end up in the hospital/drunk tank.

Anyway, Carney, a lawyer by training and a kickass blogger at The Business Insider, wrote a well reasoned, point-by-point summary of why Obama’s Too Big To Fail bank tax is unconstitutional.  I think his main error is supposing that we are actually operating under any system of constitutional law whatsoever.

When rich people panic, laws are thrown out the window.  When the nation is under extreme duress, laws are suspended or shoved aside to make room for expedience.  This may be objectionable or pragmatic, depending on your own philosophy, but as John says in his post, it is what it is.

My argument is a simple but elegant one:

Since neither the construction nor the operation of TARP or its sister programs was constitutional to begin with, it is an absurdity to argue that the addition to this program of a new recompensatory feature violates the constitution.  This would be like arguing about what color a unicorn’s tail is supposed to be.

The Too Big To Fail Tax is simply the continuation of an unnatural progression that began the moment Bush’s team decided that the banks themselves were sacred.  Once we tripped down into that gulch, the constitution became irrelevant to the bailout and by extension, to anything that came after the initial effort to save and support companies with taxpayer dollars.

I am not a lawyer and so am not as well-versed in constitutional law as Mr Carney, but I have an even better tool at my disposal – the perspicacity to see when rules are being made up on the fly or being discarded at will.  No legal precedents could justify the subsequent randomness once Paulson and Bernanke constructed the tribute bailout itself.  Consider the following two highlights of rescue-related lawlessness and then tell me why the funding of TARP via a new levy could even begin to be judged on case law citations:

1.  Bear is rescued, Lehman is not…was a coin flipped or did someone not sit someone else at a good table near the dance floor at a Potomac, Maryland Bar Mitzvah 6 years ago?

2.  In the cases of WaMu, Merrill, Bank of America, Fannie and Freddie etc the bondholders are rescued in some cases while the preferreds are wiped out, in other cases the equity holders are thrown a lifeline.  Again, are we talking popularity contest or is this about who fessed up to Hank first?

Is there a single instance where the constitution provisions for the government to run a Survivor-style tribal council, randomly voting banks off the island and forcing the remaining investment banks to form alliances with each other?

If Wile E. Coyote could look down at this point, he would see nothing but air beneath him – certainly not the bedrock of established legal catechism.  And don’t get me started on the auto bailouts (which were also union bailouts).  For Obama to grab hold of that industry is in the same class as Henry the VIII’s taking over of the English church just to get with the latest chick who caught his eye at court.

I could go on forever about the unconstitutionality of wealthy ex-bankers turned regulators writing up wishlists on behalf of their former colleagues but all of this stuff has been well-documented.

So if the program was designed in violation of the rule of law, on what grounds can we expect the rule of law to apply to the payment of the program?  The answer is we cannot, and the constitution has nothing to do with it whatsoever.

What say ye, John?


Oh No! Obama’s Bank Tax is Unconstitutional!  (Clusterstock)

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Be Rich Now! commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  2. Bitcoin Evolution Review commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  3. immediate edge review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  4. bitcoin evolution what is it commented on Sep 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  5. commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 23886 more Info to that Topic: […]

  6. 사설토토 commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  7. Sex chemical commented on Oct 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  8. wallet online bet malaysia commented on Nov 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  9. td bank easyweb commented on Dec 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 83721 more Information to that Topic: […]