Who Really Gets Punished by a Wall Street Salary Cap?

The Merrill Lynch Helicopter to the Rescue

The Merrill Lynch Helicopter to the Rescue

Yesterday, the Obama administration announced that firms who are significant moochers of the TARP will have salary caps imposed on their executives of $500,000 per year.  While the effects will be deeply felt on Wall Street, let us not forget that many other individuals and businesses will also be devastated.  Below is a list of other people or entities who will be severely affected by the Wall Street Salary Cap:

  • Any NYC/ Hamptons restaurateur who happens to be named Nello or Alain
  • The Merrill Lynch Helicopter pilot (yeah, there’s actually a Merrill Lynch Helicopter, and life is better knowing that one exists, ya know, for all the emergencies that require a bond broker to be flown in)
  • Two words: Doggie Spas
  • Superbroker-to-the-Super-Stars Dolly Lenz (No Dolly, high-end apartment sales will NOT be immune and there is no such thing as Santa Claus)
  • Event planners (usually hot girls, married) and assistant event planners (even hotter girls, but engaged) and event planner trainees (the hottest girls, single and 15 minutes out of school)
  • Most of the message board trolls on Dealbreaker (commence hate-spew, thou unholy minions employed by Swiss Banks – I love you anyway)
  • Anyone pushing private jet timeshares (time to go get a law degree, while daddy can still afford to pay)
  • That busboy from Peter Luger’s who was about to open his own steakhouse, following in the footsteps of the rest of the waiters, chefs, and valet parkers from there who’ve done the same (sorry fans of Wolfgang’s, it just ain’t Luger’s)
  • John Thain‘s custom commode guy (I hear he’s good)
  • Fast Eddie’s Maybachs 4 Less dealership in Parsippany, New Jersey

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Joshua M Brown commented on Feb 07

    Oh, there were plenty of ’em

    In 2006 I saw some runner-up girl from The Apprentice go on CNBC and explain that real estate was superior to the stock market because with 50K you could only own 50k worth of stock but you could own half a mil worth of real estate. I wonder where she is now, hopefully not an investor in TRMP!

  2. Joshua M Brown commented on Feb 07

    Oh, there were plenty of ’em

    In 2006 I saw some runner-up girl from The Apprentice go on CNBC and explain that real estate was superior to the stock market because with 50K you could only own 50k worth of stock but you could own half a mil worth of real estate. I wonder where she is now, hopefully not an investor in TRMP!

  3. Joshua M Brown commented on Feb 07

    Oh, there were plenty of ’em

    In 2006 I saw some runner-up girl from The Apprentice go on CNBC and explain that real estate was superior to the stock market because with 50K you could only own 50k worth of stock but you could own half a mil worth of real estate. I wonder where she is now, hopefully not an investor in TRMP!

  4. Anal_yst commented on Feb 08

    I really abuse/overuse this quote (regardless of who said it, Menken, Barnum, or whoever), but, perhaps no truer words were said than these:

    “No man has ever gone broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people”

    I’m curious how the NAR (its employees, members, etc), the MBA (Mortgage Brokers Association, that is), etc have not yet faced class-action suits for their complicity in this mess. Of course, with that as a precedent, there’s virtually no end to the number of parties that could/will end up being sued, but that’s an entirely different story altogether…

  5. Anal_yst commented on Feb 08

    I really abuse/overuse this quote (regardless of who said it, Menken, Barnum, or whoever), but, perhaps no truer words were said than these:

    “No man has ever gone broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people”

    I’m curious how the NAR (its employees, members, etc), the MBA (Mortgage Brokers Association, that is), etc have not yet faced class-action suits for their complicity in this mess. Of course, with that as a precedent, there’s virtually no end to the number of parties that could/will end up being sued, but that’s an entirely different story altogether…

  6. Anal_yst commented on Feb 08

    I really abuse/overuse this quote (regardless of who said it, Menken, Barnum, or whoever), but, perhaps no truer words were said than these:

    “No man has ever gone broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people”

    I’m curious how the NAR (its employees, members, etc), the MBA (Mortgage Brokers Association, that is), etc have not yet faced class-action suits for their complicity in this mess. Of course, with that as a precedent, there’s virtually no end to the number of parties that could/will end up being sued, but that’s an entirely different story altogether…

  7. immediate edge scam commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]

  8. bitcoin era commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]

  9. wanlanshop.com commented on Oct 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]

  10. Sig Sauer guns in stock commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]

  11. Online reputation management company commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]

  12. Kampala International University commented on Dec 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/02/05/who-really-gets-punished-by-a-wall-street-salary-cap/ […]