Do “Insurance Cuts” Actually Work?

Scott Minerd (Guggenheim) weighs in on whether or not the “insurance cuts” the Federal Reserve is in the process of executing have any real efficacy historically. He finds that the usage of rate cuts during the late stages of an expansion have a mixed record – sometimes they’ve been able to put off a recession but mostly they haven’t…

The historical evidence is mixed on this issue. While there have been two notable periods in the 1990s where rate cuts helped avoid—or at least delay—a recession, we also know that the Fed was cutting rates in advance of the last three recessions.

The Fed does not have a consistent track record of using rate cuts to stave off recessions. While it was successful in the 1990s, cutting rates did not have the same impact in other late-cycle scenarios.

Here’s the Fed Funds target rate, the shading represents recessionary periods, the green and red stripes indicate successful attempts at pushing off recession versus unsuccessful:

Josh here – now, of course, the Fed Funds rate is just a blunt tool and to expect it to stave off every economic slowdown would be to ascribe “silver bullet” powers to the cost of money – which is not reality. There are too many other factors that drive economic growth (or the lack thereof) – everything from demography to business conditions to innovation to geopolitics.

Minerd goes on to note “In order for rate cuts to stimulate the economy and avoid a downturn, they need to work through one of two channels: spurring credit growth or easing financial conditions.” Here’s the problem with this – in the current cycle there is plenty of credit growth and financial conditions have arguably never been easier.

So perhaps insurance cuts are just there to serve as a “confidence fairy” and make capital markets participants feel better? What part of the Fed’s dual mandate does this sort of operation satisfy? Unemployment is low and prices are tame. Are we really trying to encourage more leverage? Plenty of that in the system already too.


Forecasting the Next Recession: Will Rate Cuts Be Enough? (Guggenheim) 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. regression testing commented on Dec 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. Progress Lighting P3855-09 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: […]