Is Book Value Irrelevant?

There are two drop-dead great reads I’ve come across in the past few days that address a topic with big implications for value investing – maybe for all investing.

This weekend’s Barron’s cover story asks the question of whether it’s time for value investing to start outperforming again. It’s been an okay strategy, quantitatively speaking, throughout the post-crisis period but relative to growth investing, it’s been terrible.

Barron’s:

To be fair, value stocks have had a good run, just not quite as good as growth stocks. Over the past decade, the Russell 1000 Value index has returned 102%—not too shabby, but significantly less than the 178% for the Russell 1000 Growth, and behind the broader market’s 137% return.

Questions are being asked about if the corporate landscape has changed so much that we need to junk this metric entirely and think about a new way to measure the assets of a company. This is because book value captures the hard assets of a firm (equipment, physical facilities, etc) and misses what have become the defining advantages of the modern business – the brand, the intellectual property, the human capital, the competitive moat, the market share and the degree of consumer lock-in.

So by building portfolios that are overweighted toward companies that trade are less expensive book-to-market valuations – a mainstay metric used by both active and passive value strategies – are investors missing the most important corporate traits to be tilting towards? Are they tilting toward the opposite of this era’s biggest winners?

Barron’s reporter Reshma Kapadia continues:

But there’s a problem with price/book: today’s economy. Price/book, perhaps the most conventional measure of value, evaluates stock prices based on a company’s book value—the worth of all tangible assets but no intangible ones. Price/book and similar accounting-based metrics worked better in an industrial-based economy, when companies owned valuable tangible assets, like manufacturing plants and equipment. Today’s service economy is filled with companies whose biggest assets are their brands, intellectual property, or customer loyalty, which don’t show up on the balance sheet.

Dyed-in-the-wool value investors who have relied upon balance sheets and book-to-market metrics will tell you that nothing’s changed at all, and that mean reversion will soon balance out the huge disparity between growth and value stocks. They’ll dismiss these concerns about the lagging factor performance as yet another example of “This time it’s different” thinking. Maybe they’ll be right.

But the problem goes beyond the growth vs value paradigm that has always existed. The popularity of stock buybacks, as opposed to dividends, is also wreaking havoc with surface analysis of simple equity valuation techniques.

My friends at O’Shaughnessy Asset Management have an important take on this. In their April commentary, OSAM focuses on what’s wrong with traditional balance sheet quantitative analysis and the things it’s missed. Travis Fairchild writes:

Balance sheets prepared under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are doing an increasingly poor job of reflecting the value of shareholders equity. Recent trends have tended to bias assets well below market value which has led to the increased frequency of negative equity and Veiled Value stocks. Those tend to fall into three main categories, that we will cover in detail:

1) Understated Intangible Assets: brand names, human capital, advertising, and research and development (R&D) are rarely represented on the balance sheet

2) Understated Long Term Assets: assets are often depreciated faster than their useful lives

3) Buybacks and Dividends: when buybacks and dividends exceed net income, they create a decrease in equity which can accelerate distortions

It would be a disservice to summarize Fairchild’s note here, it’s much better for you to read the whole thing to understand the points he’s raising.

I highly recommend both links for serious investors.

Sources:

Are Value Stocks Ready to Grow Again? (Barron’s)

Negative Equity, Veiled Value, and the Erosion of Price-to-Book (O’Shaughnessy Asset Management)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Is Book Value Irrelevant? – Financial Solutions commented on Apr 30

    […] There are two drop-dead great reads I’ve come across in the past few days that address a topic with big implications for value investing – maybe for all investing. This weekend’s Barron’s cover story asks the question of whether it’s time for value investing to start outperforming again. It’s been an okay strategy, quantitatively speaking, throughout the post-crisis period but relative … Source: http://thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  2. w88 commented on Sep 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  3. Bitcoin Era Review commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  4. best wigs for chemo patients commented on Oct 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  5. 메이저놀이터 commented on Dec 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  6. 파워볼사이트 commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 14407 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  7. wig commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  8. Korg MR-1000 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]

  9. paito warna sgp commented on Jan 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2018/04/30/is-book-value-irrelevant/ […]