Investors Will Never Get the Answer to “Why Now?”

Andrew Lo’s heuristic to understanding why markets are resistant to rules is that we can’t think about them as though they’re governed by physics or mechanics. He refers to markets as biological systems, which are highly susceptible to unpredictability, adaptation and evolution. I think that’s right, based on everything I’ve seen, read and experienced over the last twenty years. Or, I should say, this is the best explanation I’ve seen anyone make.

Attempts to understand why things happen are best done in hindsight, never before the fact or during. And even then, we have no way to prove we’re right because there’s no counterfactual – we don’t get to rerun the experiment, with changes to the millions of variables, over and over again. We can only pretend that what had just happened was obvious from the start.

And we certainly can’t say, with a straight face, why an impossible thing all of a sudden becomes possible at a given moment in time. Investors will never get the answer to “Why now?”

I was thinking about this after digesting the latest weekend note from Eric Peters…

She imagined the board. Sixty-four black and white squares. Her opponent did the same. Three moves ahead lay 9 million possible combinations. Four moves ahead, 288 billion. A typical game contains more possible combinations than atoms in the universe. Google’s DeepMind artificial intelligence taught herself to play chess in four hours, then unseated earth’s long-reigning computer. Feeling lucky, she quite naturally turned her attention to Bitcoin. Where in a single week, the price of discrete lines of computer code leapt from 11k to 12k, then 13k, 14k, 15k, 16k, 17k, 18k, and 19k, dropping to 14k and climbing to 16k. To understand the phenomenon, DeepMind examined the entirety of human history. Booms, busts, facts, fictions. She searched for patterns, progressions, mapping market prices onto each rise and fall along our inexorable advance.

And DeepMind examined every theory for these manias of our making; illusions, delusions. Most followed a parabolic path, ended abruptly. Our history books examined each example from every angle. Yet they reoccurred with regularity. Afterwards, such folly appeared obvious, to humans that is. But not to DeepMind. Tulips, South Sea Bubbles, the Nifty Fifty, Nikkei, Sock Puppets, McMansions too. Up, down, spectacularly. “But why and when?” asked DeepMind, unable to understand their origins and endings.

In her parallel processors, a Tunisian fruit merchant lit himself afire, sparking the Arab Spring. DeepMind deconstructed innumerable revolutionary flashpoints, unable to understand why any one specific spark ignites an inferno. “Why him, why her, why then?” she asked each time, perplexed. Following decades of rising inequality, US populism has erupted. “Why now?” she wondered. America’s #MeToo movement appeared overnight, while the harassment it exposes haunted women forever. “Why now?” And DeepMind considered a possibility, infinitely exciting; that in a universe governed by natural law, operating with perfect precision, human behavior is its only true mystery, its greatest gift.

Josh here – just because something is a permanent mystery, that doesn’t mean we ought to to let it lie and make no attempt to understand it. It is in the process of trying to solve the unsolvable that we discover important truths about the markets and become more greatly aware of our own limitations. Being reminded of how little we can ever really know should not lead to frustration or pessimism, it should leads to enlightenment about how we ought to go about putting money at risk.

The only true answer when people ask “Why did that happen now, out of the blue?” is to say “Because.”

Source:

One River Asset Management

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Investors Will Never Get the Answer to “Why Now?” – Financial Solutions commented on Dec 10

    […] Andrew Lo’s heuristic to understanding why markets are resistant to rules is that we can’t think about them as though they’re governed by physics or mechanics. He refers to markets as biological systems, which are highly susceptible to unpredictability, adaptation and evolution. I think that’s right, based on everything I’ve seen, read and experienced over the last twenty years. Or, I should … Source: http://thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  2. w88 commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  3. togel hk commented on Dec 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  4. pinup-ua.casino commented on Dec 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  5. Regression Testing commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  6. Centerpoint CPAC2X manuals commented on Jan 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 317 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]

  7. bandar togel commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/12/10/investors-will-never-get-the-answer-to-why-now/ […]