Why Are European Stocks Chronically Cheaper Than US Stocks?

I’m plowing through this really interesting report from Deutsche Bank on why European stocks are always cheaper than US stocks (on price/book value) and coming across all sorts of great insights. (Shout to Steve G for sending)

Right now, despite the rally in foreign stocks this year, US companies currently sell at an obscenely high 70% premium to their Euro counterparts. That’s a 20-year high. Here’s DB’s John Tierney, Sebastian Raedler and Andreas Bruckner on the phenomenon:

Everything is generally bigger in America: cars, homes, food portions and stock valuations. Investors currently deem American companies to be worth 3.1 times book value. European stocks, with a price to book multiple of 1.9 times, seem like a bargain by comparison.

This valuation premium of US relative to European stocks is a persistent feature rather than a fleeting anomaly. The price to book ratio for American companies has on average been almost 50 per cent above those for European ones over the past two decades, with the current 70 per cent price-to-book premium close to a 20-year high. However, even at its narrowest, the valuation gap was still 20 per cent in favour of the US during the two years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis (Figure 2).

One plausible-sounding explanation for the valuation gap, namely the very dissimilar sector composition of the major US and European stock indices, turns out not to be relevant in practice. Start by excluding the financials sector. Even on an ex-financials basis, the price-to-book ratio of the S&P 500 is 3.6, whereas it is 2.3 for the Stoxx 600. Thus, the valuation premium of the US index remains intact even after removing financial companies from the comparison.

Josh here – right about now is when someone (usually me) will blurt out “IT’S BECAUSE WE HAVE MORE TECHNOLOGY STOCKS” but Deutsche demonstrates that the premium is still there when you take out tech (Apple, Google) as well as consumer discretionary (AMZN).

So what is the reason? The strategists focus in on Return On Equity (ROE) as being the crucial driver of this discrepancy. Structurally, we have higher margins, cheaper equity capital and a better tax system (despite the spurious claim that taxes on US corps make us non-competitive – it’s actually not true). We also have more flexible labor markets here and are better at refinancing debt at lower rates.

The implications?

The most interesting question is whether or not this premium will exist forever. Or, if it is permanent, should it really be 70%? And what will be the drivers of this spread narrowing in the future – falling US price/book or Euro indices rising to meet ours at higher levels?

As a firm that believes in global asset allocation – and a firm that raised international exposure to overweight in our strategic models this past January (read about that here) – these questions may not be answerable today but they are certainly worthy of consideration.


What explains the valuation gap between US and European equities?
Deutsche Bank – September 27th, 2017

Read Also:

What We’re Telling Clients About European Stocks (TRB)

Talk to us about your asset allocation here.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. wigs for women commented on Dec 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/05/why-are-european-stocks-chronically-cheaper-than-us-stocks/ […]

  2. Hotpoint-Ariston WMF 720 manuals commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/05/why-are-european-stocks-chronically-cheaper-than-us-stocks/ […]