Everyone is Full of S***, Part 638

Greg Ip at the Wall Street Journal calling it as he sees it (will probably get fired):

Throughout Barack Obama’s eight years as president, Republicans hammered relentlessly at the horrors of debt. In 2011 they took the country to the brink of default because they didn’t want to raise the statutory debt ceiling. Last year candidate Donald Trump repeatedly ripped Mr. Obama for doubling federal debt.

Yet in their drive to overhaul taxes, President Trump and his congressional allies are about to make the trajectory of debt even worse.

Long story short, the budget allows for some $1.5 trillion in tax cuts over the next ten years, anything above that must be paid for somehow. Trump’s plan, which, as is characteristic, is short on details but long on promises he can’t keep. He’s proposing a little over $5 trillion in reductions to the tax base, most of which will never happen in his wildest dreams. Read Anthony Nitti at Forbes for why this is all going to be nearly impossible.

This proposal would be deficit spending way into the future on a galactic scale. When the other guy was president, congress wouldn’t even agree to fund the current government. Hilarious to see how quickly all of that pious hand-wringing about debt and deficits is forgotten about.

Now, in Fantasyland, all of these cuts will pay for themselves by unleashing faster economic growth. We’ll leave aside that this didn’t work out under Bush II, who oversaw an eight year period of wage stagnation, rising income inequality, economic slowing and then financial catastrophe. In the real world, deficit spending will ultimately push a key debt ratio higher, faster:

But permanently widening deficits is risky when the publicly held federal debt, now 77% of GDP, is on track to hit 91% in a decade as aging baby boomers draw on Social Security and Medicare. A $1.5 trillion tax cut would push that to 100%, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a watchdog group.

If the GOP wants to do this, they should do it (or at least try). But let’s not pretend that anyone has any actual principles anymore.


The Tenuous Logic Behind Republicans’ About-Face on Debt (Wall Street Journal) 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. w88 commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/09/28/everyone-is-full-of-s-part-638/ […]

  2. bitcoin evolution commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/09/28/everyone-is-full-of-s-part-638/ […]

  3. mrdrivewayllc.com commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 72718 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/09/28/everyone-is-full-of-s-part-638/ […]

  4. dumps with pin shop commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/09/28/everyone-is-full-of-s-part-638/ […]