Can the Fed stay independent?

It’s not a secret that Janet Yellen hails from the left-leaning San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank originally. It’s also not a secret that the Fed takes global matters into consideration when setting policy. This might present a problem in a new “America First” environment in Washington.

For how much longer will the Fed Chairperson – or the organization it its entirety – be given the leeway to operate apolitically and independently as it always has since its inception a century ago? Will the White House seek to gain control or additional oversight of the institution? Will there come a time when the President (and his people) desire to become more involved with the interest rate policy-setting mechanism? How will the relationship between the Fed and the administration fare should there be an economic or financial market disruption?

These questions are worth considering in light of a letter sent from Patrick McHenry, the Vice Chairman of the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee.

You can read it here (via FT Alphaville):


Janet Yellen’s term as the Fed Chair ends January 18th and she’s slated to stay on the Board of Governors through 2024. Any thoughts about whether or not she lasts that long, voluntarily or otherwise?

I’ve been thinking a bit about William McChesney Martin, the Fed Chairman who came in under Truman in 1952 and stuck around until the Nixon administration in 1970. Kennedy didn’t trust Martin at first, but ultimately asked him to stay on. The 1960’s were one of the greatest uninterrupted decades of prosperity ever, and Martin’s independence had a lot to do with that. LBJ wanted “low rates all the time” but Martin stood up to this pressure, notably in 1965 with rate hikes the President fought against.

Can any Federal Reserve official stand up to the “new political order” that President Trump’s closest advisors are now openly discussing? We might find out.


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Digital Transformation commented on Feb 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 21561 more Info on that Topic: […]