Five reasons why ‘Batman v Superman’ didn’t work

This weekend – its second weekend in theaters – Batman v Superman posted a horrendous drop at the box office. This is a clear indicator that word of mouth has been bad, that the problem is bigger than just the tepid takes from film critics. After all, the critics didn’t think much of Guardians of the Galaxy, but audiences kept showing up – because people walked out of the theater smiling and raving.

So why don’t people like Batman v Superman? Principally because it just doesn’t work. It’s not all bad, but no aspect of it is great and only a little bit of it is good. On the whole, it’s just a fail.

Here are my reasons why (mild spoilers follow):

5. Too long – entire subplots and lots of flashbacks could have been cut out. Several major characters turned out to have been superfluous. Every Laurence Fishburne scene was a waste of time. I could done without a third of the Lois Lane they gave us and it still would have been too much. The addition of Wonder Woman was utterly pointless from a creative standpoint and it was, transparently, a corporate decision (more on this later).

4. Pointless – I know Batman and Superman have fought in the comics, but that was mainly as a stunt to sell comic books. With movies, it’s unecessary. We’re going to turn out for all these movies no matter what. Ant Man was a box office home run, for god’s sake. The whole conceit of having Batman and Superman fight, only to team up, and tease the Justice League was a waste of time. If you want to do Justice League, then just start with that. Why does every movie have to set up an entire studio’s slate for the next three summers? “Marvel does it” isn’t a good enough reason. Marvel trounces DC in every respect – Batman is DC’s only answer to Marvel but it’s already been done to death.

3. Dark – you can count on one hand how many moments of the film took place in daylight. Maybe the brightest scene in the movie was a funeral scene. It’s not artistic, it’s just gloom.

2. The villains – no one, I repeat no one, is buying Jesse Eisenberg as a super villain. He’s a good actor, just in the wrong role here. And he definitely crammed in too much time studying Heath Ledger’s Joker in preparation – the speech patterns, the cadences, it all feels contrived. And the monster – maybe the worst, most after-the-fact introduction of a movie monster in Hollywood history.

1. Finally – and this is the most important thing – in it’s grand ambition to be taken seriously and to deal with themes bigger than superheroes, they lost the kids. My son is six and was bored after 20 minutes. My ten year old daughter was checking her phone after 40 minutes and texted me her prediction for the end (nailed it). Both walked out of the theater a little confused about various plot points and motivation and a lot relieved that it was over.

These are the reasons why the studio just saw a 69% week over week drop in attendance. It’s a big missed opportunity for all involved.

And that’s coming from someone who wanted to like it. Oh well.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]

  2. is bitcoin evolution a con commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: […]

  3. fun88 commented on Oct 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  4. replica watches commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  5. replica watch info commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  6. Canon LV-X320 manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]