Pros Chase Performance Off a Cliff

The performance chase among active stock managers. It’s never not hilarious. Everyone’s overweight the thing that’s been working and underweight the thing that isn’t. Then the tables turn and the whole thing sails right over the cliff’s edge.

JPMorgan via Business Insider (emphasis mine):

67% of mutual funds underperformed their benchmark in the third quarter, with more than one-third, or 34%, underperforming by at least 250 basis points, or 2.5%.

Those stats are based on a universe of more than 2,300 active funds with more than $5.5 trillion in assets…

“The Sector positioning explains recent active manager underperformance. In 3Q mutual funds have been favoring Healthcare (+2.0% overweight) with their largest single overweight in Pharma/Biotech (+1.1%) while most underweight Staples (-2.0%). During the quarter, Healthcare significantly underperformed (-11%) while Staples faired much better (-0.9%).

If you went into Q3 underweight healthcare, you weren’t in the cool club. If you went in overweight consumer staples, you were at risk of being stuffed into a locker by the alpha jocks in the hallways of Market High.

Which is, of course, why the former stopped working and the latter held up better. When volatility struck, it was the cool club stocks that were the most over-owned and that needed to be vomited up to the redemption gods.

Rinse and repeat. Again, this will never not be hilarious.


Fund managers everywhere are getting crushed (Business Insider)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web