My Review of the Goldman Sachs Elevator Book

straight-to-hell-book-coverI’ve read a lot of books this summer, some informative and some highly entertaining. Not many of them were able to be both at the same time. The book Straight to Hell, by John LeFevre of @GSElevator fame, managed to pull this particular dual mandate off.

My review of the book appears in Barron’s this weekend, you can read it here. Below, I give you some background on why I chose to review it and why I think you should add it to your own reading list.

John LeFevre is an absolute sociopath. I’d like to say that his whistleblowing on the dearth of morality in global finance makes him a sort of “Reformed Banker” except for the fact that the author doesn’t grasp for any such redemption through the telling of his story. This isn’t a varnished version of his experiences meant to act as a résumé builder. Instead, it’s a pitch-black account of last decade’s Asian credit boom and the maniacs who enabled it while enjoying the perks of being rich and connected in post-millennial Hong Kong.

The Wall Street tell-all has been done before; these books usually wrap up with some sort of emotional payoff where our protagonists learn the error of their ways and atone for the sins they’ve committed while in thrall to the higher powers governing their actions – the firm, the environment, the system, man. In The Wolf of Wall Street, Jordan Belfort blames the drugs. In Why I Left Goldman Sachs, Greg Smith blames the company’s culture. In Backstage Wall Street, which was my own parting shot at the brokerage industry, I blamed the business model I had found myself trapped in for ten years.

What sets Straight to Hell apart from these stories is that, in the end, there is no redemption whatsoever. No one learns anything or becomes a better person. Nothing is resolved through good deeds or a change of heart. Finally, it takes a flood of biblical proportions, in the form of the global credit crisis, to wash away the excess and the ugliness of the era. And in the tale’s conclusion, after all the wheeling and dealing, the drinking and snorting, the cheating and fucking, there is only John LeFevre, gleefully riding to hell and taking as many other sinners down with him as he can.

There’s lots of controversy surrounding his book and some questions have come up about the validity of some of the stories. Was there some embellishment, as detractors say, or has just about every anecdote and incident been confirmed by eyewitnesses, as LeFevre claims?

I don’t think it matters either way.

It’s funny, well-written and educational. Besides, would anyone suggest, with a straight face, that Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle could have made it through a 21st century fact-check, given the content of that book? Could Ida Tarbell have slipped her groundbreaking work on John D. Rockefeller of a hundred years ago past the modern goalie, given the cuts and wounds she would have endured in today’s blog-enabled takedown culture? No chance.

The book manages to teach a lot about the mechanics of bond issuance while simultaneously entertaining the reader as massive deals are massaged, managed and mangled around the world. LeFevre’s contributed a classic to the genre. Anyone interested in global finance, credit markets or cocaine-fueled debauchery should give it a read.

My Barron’s Review:

Book Reviews: Climate Shock, Straight to Hell (Barron’s)

Buy the book here:

Straight to Hell (Amazon)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web