One Way to Solve the Fiduciary Debate: Truth in Advertising

the reality is that when advisors and salespeople are clearly labeled as such, consumers actually can understand the difference. We intuitively understand that the advice of a doctor or lawyer is different than the fashion “advice” of the salesperson in a clothing store or the nutritional "advice" of the person behind the counter in a butcher shop. And in fact, subjecting salespeople to an advice standard can create more problems than it solves, whether it’s making butchers become Registered Dieticians, or turning brokers into fiduciaries while they are supposed to still fulfill their actual role as brokers.

Accordingly, perhaps the better solution to the blurring of the distinction between investment advisers and brokers is not to subject them all to a single uniform fiduciary standard as "financial advisors", but instead to simply re-assert the dividing line between them. Let advisors be [investment] advisers (subject to the fiduciary rule that already exists), brokers be brokers, and rather than mixing the two let each hold out as such to the public - where brokers are called brokers and investment advisers are called investment advisers - so consumers understand the true choice being presented to them. In other words, consumers don't deserve a choice between fiduciary and suitability; they deserve a choice between advisers and salespeople.

Michael Kitces may be on to something here – let brokers who are in the business of selling investment products with only incidental advice go back to labeling themselves as brokers, and not “investment consultants” or “financial advisors” or “private wealth managers” or whatever other names are causing so much confusion for the public.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. geneve salon erotique commented on Oct 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  2. 안전놀이터 commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  3. Devops strategy commented on Nov 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  4. 안전놀이터 commented on Dec 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  5. order nembutal with credit card commented on Dec 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 42186 more Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  6. hottest lolita wig on sale commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 71816 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]

  7. replicas de rolex commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/30/one-way-to-solve-the-fiduciary-debate-truth-in-advertising/ […]