Jason Zweig’s “Magic” Number for Retirement

I use the word “Magic” in the title here in quotes because knowing Jason as I do, the connotation of it – simple! presto! – would make him cringe.

We built our wealth management practice around the idea of retirement and financial planning for families. Lots of people may initially come to us for asset management or investment recommendations but without a really defined sense as to the why, other than some vague sense that having more money in the future is better than having less money. And so our first job, in these cases, is reorientation. What are we investing for in the first place?

Anyway, Jason Zweig has one possible answer for how much to save for retirement and it’s a simple concept. The problem is, while the idea may be easy, executing it will not be for most. Because it requires discipline – like almost everything else worth accomplishing in life…

From the Wall Street Journal:

To be assured of having enough money to fund a comfortable retirement, you should save a total of 22 times the annual income you want to earn when you retire. That is higher than many previous estimates, but it offers near-certainty of hitting your target.

For instance, if you want $100,000 in annual income (not counting Social Security), then your magic number is $2.2 million in total retirement savings. You can hit that magic number if you are prudent and willing to save money like mad.

Now, of course, this gets tricky when you’re either really close to retirement or really far away.

When retirement is less than a decade away, there’s a good chance you’ve already passed through your peak earnings years and you’re slowing down. This means there may be less income coming in, thus making it harder to save. The good news is that the kids are probably out of the house (and your refrigerator).

When retirement is really far away – more than two or three decades – who knows what a number like $100,000 will actually mean? A lot of our work on the planning side for clients is predicated on getting the inflation-adjusted cost of things right and leaving enough flexibility in the future for changing tax rates and other unpredictable variables that could have a large impact. Your jaw would drop if I showed you what $100,000 income looks like, in real terms, years from now.

Anyway, head over for Jason’s piece, it’s really good food for thought on the topic.


Retiring on Your Own Terms (MoneyBeat)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Bitcoin Loophole Platform Review commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/02/01/jason-zweigs-magic-number-for-retirement/ […]

  2. cum se trateaza commented on Oct 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/02/01/jason-zweigs-magic-number-for-retirement/ […]

  3. DevOps consulting company commented on Nov 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/02/01/jason-zweigs-magic-number-for-retirement/ […]

  4. Harold Jahn Canada commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/02/01/jason-zweigs-magic-number-for-retirement/ […]

  5. national bank of canada commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/02/01/jason-zweigs-magic-number-for-retirement/ […]