So then I said “Taper? I just met her!”

The sell-side is starting to weigh in on what this morning’s jobs report may or may not mean for the prospects of September tapering on 9/18.

Here’s BofA Merrill Lynch:

In light of the mixed employment report, we are sticking to our call for “no taper in September.” However, given the lack of guidance out of the Fed, any probability distribution around tapering must be relatively flat. We rank the three main scenarios as follows:

No taper: Keep language that suggests tapering later in the year, but make no immediate cuts. (Our judgmental probability: 55%)

Small taper: Cut purchases by $10 to $15 bn. (Probability: 30%)

Big taper: Cut purchases by $20 to $25 bn. (Probability: 15%)

translation: flip a f***ing coin.

Here’s Credit Suisse, from a report this morning entitled ‘The Taper Cometh’:

We maintain our longstanding view that, while no time is perfect, the best
opportunity this year for the Fed to initiate a cutback in its QE3 asset
purchase program will be at the upcoming September 17-18 FOMC meeting.

The most likely tapering operation, we think, would be to scale back the
current monthly $40bn MBS / $45bn Treasury purchases by $10bn each. Our
second favorite option would be an initial taper of $15bn, a $5bn cutback in
MBS purchases and $10bn in Treasuries – the merit of this being mainly that
it brings the two purchase sizes into alignment at $35bn each.

Here’s Goldman Sachs’s Jan Hatzius, who also says they’re going forward, irregardless of the weakness in today’s report:

“While the August employment report was a moderate disappointment, we believe it is probably not weak enough to prevent the FOMC from tapering in September. However, it does raise the likelihood of a “dovish taper,” which could include a small size of the overall adjustment to purchases, and which we think would likely coincide with an enhancement of the forward guidance. The continued decline in the participation rate further highlights the justification for maintaining the fed funds rate at an exceptionally low level even after unemployment reaches 6.5%.”

Are we still pretending this is investment analysis or can we start referring to “playing the taper” as gambling?

let mew know.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Zeitarbeitsfirma Pflege Muenchen commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. Harold Jahn commented on Nov 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  3. best rolex replicas swiss made commented on Nov 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  4. easyweb td commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 84348 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  5. Regression Testing meaning commented on Dec 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 58562 more Information on that Topic: […]

  6. Click commented on Dec 11

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  7. DevSecOps Services commented on Dec 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  8. Sexy commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  9. DevOps Services commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 94825 more Info to that Topic: […]

  10. her response commented on Feb 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 38282 additional Information to that Topic: […]