Chasing the Cat

How important is it to “beat the market’?


Are you a hedge fund manager or a mutual fund manager, whose ability to do so determines how much in assets the fund can raise? Are you a proprietary trader with a bonus tied to exceeding one benchmark or another? OK, in these cases beating the market is very important.

But are you, well, anyone else? OK, then in your case, it is the most unworthy and counterproductive endeavor imaginable. Unless you are doing this for fun and not long-term prosperity. If this is “a game” for you, something you’re engaged in for thrills, an ego stroke or a time-killer between Vegas jaunts, then we are speaking a different language entirely.

Prior to comparing your returns to this or that index and then tearing out your hair over them, ask yourself whether or not it should matter. If you are speculating for the sake of speculation, by all means, grade yourself. If you are running a fund, then you won’t need to grade yourself because you are already being judged as we speak. Only 39% of active managers beat their benchmarks in 2o12, which means more than half of the fund industry is under this microscope now and the light in their faces is a harsh one. Not a pleasant place to be.

And never mind comparing yourself to an index, it’s hard enough to keep up with this orange cat from London named ‘Orlando’ who took on a gaggle of supposed market-beating fund managers:

By the end of September the professionals had generated £497 of profit compared with £292 managed by Orlando. But an unexpected turnaround in the final quarter has resulted in the cat’s portfolio increasing by an average of 4.2% to end the year at £5,542.60, compared with the professionals’ £5,176.60.

This cat, a fucking ginger no less, threw a chew toy at the stock table pages of the Financial Times and beat guys with decades of experience and unlimited research at their fingertips.

If you are anyone else besides a professional trader or fund manager, I’d recommend skipping this exercise entirely. It will not help you and can possibly drive you mad. Ask yourself the correct questions, the ones with answers that are actually relevant to you. That question for most investors is an obvious one: “Are my investments enabling me to maintain my purchasing power into the next decade, and the decade after that.”

Don’t run around chasing stock-picking cats if you don’t need to. If you’re not running a fund benchmarked to an index, alpha generation should not be your priority – peace of mind should.

Read Also:

39% of Fund Managers Beat the S&P in 2012 (The Big Picture)

Investments: Orlando is the cat’s whiskers of stock picking (Guardian)

In Investing, No Need for Sudden Death (New York Times)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bitcoin trading software commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  2. immediate edge commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]

  3. best site commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: […]

  4. replica rolex commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  5. CI/CD commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]