Bond vs Stock Flows, Impact on Performance

My bond inflows piece from Friday kicked up quite a dust storm of controversy, 45 comments and counting, many from the Japandroids* who have been secretly waiting for this parallel all along.

My friend Chris Kimble of Kimble Charting Solutions sent me an interesting chart that makes a very good point to complement what I’ve said:

I’m not sure if the TLT performance number includes dividends (the underlying bond interest payments) but I also don’t know if the SPY yield is included either. Even still, the idea that the most widely-held stock market index fund could put up a gain of this magnitude against massive net outflows for so many months is fairly remarkable – it does make one wonder what might happen under a scenario of willing equity investor participants…

Re: the TLT flows vs performance, definitely a head-scratcher. Unless we are Japan.

Read Also:

33 Times, You Poor Dumb Bastards (TRB)

* What is a Japandroid? I made that up just now (nicked the name from an indie band) – it’s how I describe those who reflexively, almost robotically, respond with a Japan comparison anytime some hints at the fact that Treasurys are overdone to the upside. The Japan comment is always on the tip of their tongue, they are waiting for you to mention Treasurys so they can do their JGB rant. It goes something like “Yeah but people said the same thing about Japanese government bonds in 1994 or 2004 or blah blah blah.” Now of course, the Japandroids could be right, but if they are, whether or not there’s a blow-off top in bond prices will be the least of our worries. 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. wigs commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  2. Digital Transformation Company commented on Feb 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 346 more Information to that Topic: […]