The Bernanke Nip Slip

By now you may have read hundreds if not thousands of blog posts and columns covering Ben Bernanke’s address at Jackson Hole yesterday.  I was, mercifully, far away from a computer screen or a TV so I escaped almost all of the “real-time” “coverage”.

But in combing through the reports this morning, I’ve found all I need to convince me that Fed action is likely at the September 13th meeting of the FOMC.  Because Bernanke had a metaphorical wardrobe malfunction, even though we know he is loathe to tip his hat other than through the more official channels like Jon Hilsenrath’s reportage.  But in his comments yesterday, we saw a bit more than perhaps the Fed Chairman wanted us to see.  We didn’t see a lot, but just enough.

Many sophisticated Fed-watchers agree with me that we got this hint.  Did he want us to see?  Like watching a Hollywood starlet ungracefully clamber out of a limousine or carelessly frolic in the waves, we cannot know for sure whether this was an intentional reveal.

Here’s The Economist:

He then catalogued the potential costs of further easing: impaired market functioning as the Fed’s share of total bonds in circulation rose; the potential for asset bubbles if interest rates are kept low for a long time; the threat of inflation if the Fed has trouble exiting from its purchases; and potential losses if the bonds lose value when interest rates rise. Mr Bernanke said “the hurdle for using non-traditional policies should be higher than for traditional policies. At the same time, the costs of non-traditional policies, when considered carefully, appear manageable, implying that we should not rule out the further use of such policies if economic conditions warrant.”

Do conditions warrant? Yes. As Mr Bernanke put it, “the economic situation is obviously far from satisfactory.”

If Mr Bernanke has made it clear that the Fed plans to act on September 13th, he has not yet clarified how. The Fed could extend its low-rate guidance past 2014, but Mr Bernanke’s speech seemed to assign such a move less efficacy than further bond purchases. If the Fed buys bonds, would it buy Treasurys or MBS or something else? By citing housing as first among the headwinds holding back the economy, and specifying the impact on mortgage rates of prior QE, he made a prima facie case for buying MBS and Treasurys. It is still not clear, though, whether the Fed would announce a fixed amount of purchases over a fixed term, or an open-ended programme (eg, $100 billion per month, keyed to economic conditions).

Regardless of the form of this particular program, the way to play is probably some CRB exposure, select financial stocks and almost anything real estate-related.


The Road to QE3 (The Economist)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. w88 commented on Sep 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. mơ thấy chụp ảnh commented on Nov 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

  3. online bmo banking commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]

  4. wigs for sale commented on Nov 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]

  5. toto hk commented on Dec 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 25312 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  6. 사설토토 commented on Dec 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  7. 메이저놀이터 commented on Dec 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 30509 more Information on that Topic: […]

  8. mơ thấy bố mẹ commented on Jan 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

  9. testing automated tools commented on Feb 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]