ETFs: Everyone Loves Vanguard

Cogent did a survey of its clients (adviser firms and brokerages) and other industry pros to determine which ETF provider has the most “favorable impression” in the eyes of the wealth management industry.  And Vanguard is crushing the field.  This is ironic when you consider the fact that vanguard was initially opposed to ETFs (in the waning days of Jack Bogle) and so was a relatively late entrant.  But having the lowest fees makes up for that as does the notion that with Vanguard, what you see is what you get.  Advisers like myself who are looking to contain costs and utilize plain vanilla indices love Vanguard and the survey confirms this.

Now you may ask, why does favorable impression matter and not AUM or tracking error, etc…My answer is that impressions are almost everything all else being equal, and many of the large ETF providers are offering overlapping products.

(for the record, our model portfolios utilize every family on this list)

From Cogent:

In addition to leading the market in favorable impression, Vanguard achieves top ratings in association with several brand imagery attributes which serve to solidify a firm’s position in the marketplace. Specifically, Vanguard achieves top marks across advisors in all channels in association with “financial stability,” “good value for the money,” “demonstrates integrity and honesty,” “fee transparency,” and “a brand clients know and trust.” Meanwhile, iShares still owns the key categories of “leader in the ETF industry” and “offers products with consistent liquidity,” although the gap with rivals is decreasing as other providers have seen improving perceptions in these areas.





This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 36870 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  2. click here commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]

  3. immediate edge scam commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

  4. Sig Sauer commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  5. regression testing commented on Dec 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  6. DevOps Services commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  7. tangerine online sign-in commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 82286 more Info on that Topic: […]

  8. cibc online banking commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 1939 additional Info to that Topic: […]