Fees vs Commissions

Fees vs Commissions?  No contest.  We’re not talking Coke and Pepsi here, we’re talking right and wrong.

Not all investors need a fee-based advisor, but no investor needs a stockbroker.  No one should pay a 3% commission to execute a stock trade or a 5% sales load to buy a mutual fund.  They should also not deal with an investment professional who is compensated based on the volume of transactions – they will never be on the same side of the table, trust me.

But the fee-based model is not without its own conflicts.  I address this topic in my latest piece for the Wall Street Journal today.  I argue that these conflicts are either obscure or manageable versus the old industry-standard compensation regime.

Having had clients as both a retail broker and a financial adviser, I can tell you emphatically that the advisory model is better.  Better for clients, better for firms and better for people like you and I who are simply trying to do the right thing with as little conflict as possible.  The brokerage and fee-based models are not merely “different,” as some captured industry participants will tell you.  One is superior than the other, period.  I realize that we live in a society where kids get “participation trophies” and no one is allowed to win or lose anymore, but this is business so let’s be real.  There is a winner here and a loser here; one method of investment management that will endure and one that is already borderline extinct.

But just because the fee-based, assets under management compensation model is better, this doesn’t mean it’s perfect.  Anytime and anywhere that money is changing hands, there is imperfection.

Head over for the whole thing:

Business Model Darwinism (WSJ)



This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. tutoring service commented on Sep 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  2. w88 commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 86759 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  3. Eat Verts commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 48013 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  4. Energy Plans commented on Oct 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  5. New England bail bonds east haven ct commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 77708 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  6. tangerine online sign in commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  7. 토토사이트 코드 commented on Dec 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]

  8. Garmin GPSMAP 4008 manuals commented on Jan 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2011/11/29/fees-vs-commissions/ […]