Please Stop with the 1995 Debt Ceiling Crisis Comparison

One thing people (myself included) can’t help themselves from doing is looking for historical analogs to current problems.  Only this time we’ve f***ed things up so badly that there really aren’t any.

The debt ceiling “crisis” of 1995-1996 was a Lego version of this one, a scale model 1/10th the intensity.  It was a structural deficit issue that was both self-inflicted and easily remedied.  Its impact on the stock market doesn’t even show up in a monthly chart going back 20 years.

Here’s Calculated Risk (from May) on why the 1995 comp is a waste of time:

In fiscal 1995, the economy was in the middle of a strong expansion with the unemployment rate around 5.6%. There was no cyclical deficit (from a recession), just a left over structural deficit that was steadily being reduced. The deficit in fiscal 1995 was 2.2% of GDP (about 10.8% of outlays).

This year, the economy is fragile, the unemployment rate is at 9.0%, and the deficit is a combination of both a structural deficit and a cyclical deficit (from the great recession). The total deficit is now close to 9% of GDP and about 37% of outlays.

In fiscal 1995, the government could do the same “extraordinary measures” as today to delay the day of reckoning, and then eventually cut off all non-essential discretionary outlays (the “government shutdown”). That was enough to buy more time, and the government didn’t have to default on the debt, or cut Social Security or Medicare payments.

Now there is a cyclical deficit on top of an even larger structural deficit. It is impossible to just shutdown non-essential discretionary outlays – the cuts will have to go deeper. So the comparison isn’t valid.

So there are two things going on here, a cyclical deficit (which we should be able to grow out of within a few years provided we don’t do anything too stupid) and a structural deficit which is really the political question of the day.

The “crisis” is really one that is manufactured and meant to determine which ideology is going to control the heart and soul of America going forward.  The party that originally championed the Laffer model of lower-taxes-equals-higher-revenues (the ultimate have your cake and eat it too economic concept) is now concerned about deficits and spending.  Great, we’ll see if they’re concerned enough to give a cotton-picking inch on raising tax rates.  So far, it doesn’t appear that they will.


Debt Ceiling: False Comparisons to 1995 / 1996 (Calculated Risk)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. คอนโดเงินเหลือ commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 77801 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  2. zegarki rolex podróbki commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  3. Bitcoin Era Review 2020 commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: […]

  4. online dating commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 73697 more Information to that Topic: […]

  5. 사설토토 commented on Oct 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  6. Matt Erausquin commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  7. tangerine banque sign in commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

  8. Regression Testing commented on Dec 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]

  9. dumps pin shop 2021 commented on Dec 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 16590 more Info to that Topic: […]

  10. 먹튀사이트 commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  11. DevOps Solutions commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: […]

  12. rego check commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: […]

  13. Echo Audio Mona manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]