Your Blogroll Sucks…and Mine Does Too

Building a blogroll is like attempting a long-distance relationship –  you will work really hard at it for the first month or so and then pretty much let neglect take its toll.

Some of the top finance bloggers have blogrolls or “links” pages that haven’t been added to, subtracted from or even glanced at in months.  In some cases, years!  It’s not that they don’t care, it’s more an issue of the real-time news taking precedence over updating a static section of the site.  If I have an hour-and-a-half to dedicate to TRB on a given day, I will need every one of those 90 minutes to keep the content up-to-date and fresh, there simply will not be time to update much else.

Even some of my blogger heroes have link sections or pages that are woefully outdated.  In one case, the guy has 100 links, many to sites that were popular back in 2006 but are no longer putting out meaningful content.  Even worse, many of these links lead to error messages.  Oh, and I’m not on there, which is obviously unacceptable.

There are also blogs that will frequently link to a site but never get around to adding that site to the “official” blogroll.  I am personally guilty of this.  Since first constructing my blogroll in 2008, there have probably been 30 sites that I’ve begun to read regularly (by following them in my Google Reader) and haven’t added.  In the time it took me to write this post about weak blogrolling, I probably could’ve simply updated my blogroll – and this is an affirmation of my point about the freshness of content being the priority.

My current list suits me, although it is missing many great financial bloggers to be sure.  Before moving over to the StockTwits Network, my list was three times as long but a lot of what was there was just obligatory and a waste of space.  I owe a Thank You to Phil Pearlman for convincing me that blogrolls in general are bullsh*t anyway and that having 75 links renders the ones that are actually meaningful to you irrelevant.

I guess my point is that I’m not diligent about the blogroll here on TRB and it is far from an accurate representation of my regular reads.  But I also don’t believe its become so vestigial that it deserves deleting yet either.

One day I’ll get around to it.  I bet I’m not the only blogger thinking this way.

What do you guys think?

Tags: ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bitcoin era commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. older dating commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  3. tangerine bank account signin commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  4. dumps track 1 and 2 commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  5. fake rolex commented on Dec 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]

  6. Harold Jahn Edmonton commented on Dec 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  7. fake tag heuer duty free commented on Dec 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  8. Devops commented on Jan 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: […]

  9. Harman Kardon AVR 510 manuals commented on Jan 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]