Volcker: No Need for Commercial Banks to be Hedge Funds

In today’s New York Times op-ed, Paul Volcker gives voice to the recent proposals he and President Obama have floated in their bid to show a serious front on financial regulation.

Here’s what Tall Paul had to say about commercial banks engaging in risky behavior with customer capital:

The point of departure is that adding further layers of risk to the inherent risks of essential commercial bank functions doesn’t make sense, not when those risks arise from more speculative activities far better suited for other areas of the financial markets.

The specific points at issue are ownership or sponsorship of hedge funds and private equity funds, and proprietary trading — that is, placing bank capital at risk in the search of speculative profit rather than in response to customer needs. Those activities are actively engaged in by only a handful of American mega-commercial banks, perhaps four or five. Only 25 or 30 may be significant internationally.

Apart from the risks inherent in these activities, they also present virtually insolvable conflicts of interest with customer relationships, conflicts that simply cannot be escaped by an elaboration of so-called Chinese walls between different divisions of an institution. The further point is that the three activities at issue — which in themselves are legitimate and useful parts of our capital markets — are in no way dependent on commercial banks’ ownership. These days there are literally thousands of independent hedge funds and equity funds of widely varying size perfectly capable of maintaining innovative competitive markets. Individually, such independent capital market institutions, typically financed privately, are heavily dependent like other businesses upon commercial bank services, including in their case prime brokerage. Commercial bank ownership only tilts a “level playing field” without clear value added.

Sounds like a lot less prop trading at JPMorgan and Goldman will be turning in its commercial bank charter any minute.

Read the whole thing:

How to Reform Our Financial System
By PAUL VOLCKER
Published: January 30, 2010

Tags: , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. 스포츠토토 commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/31/volcker-no-need-for-commercial-banks-to-be-hedge-funds/ […]

  2. bitcoin evolution es real commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/31/volcker-no-need-for-commercial-banks-to-be-hedge-funds/ […]

  3. td canada trust login easyweb commented on Dec 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/31/volcker-no-need-for-commercial-banks-to-be-hedge-funds/ […]

  4. Kimber Guns In Stock commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/31/volcker-no-need-for-commercial-banks-to-be-hedge-funds/ […]

  5. CI CD Solutions commented on Feb 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 70263 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/31/volcker-no-need-for-commercial-banks-to-be-hedge-funds/ […]