Luckily For GE, NBC's Not A Prop Trading Desk

I don’t watch late night TV on the networks.  One 15 minute episode of Tim and Eric is funnier than 6 months worth of Conan, Leno, Letterman or whoever else the networks put on.

I’ll just throw this quick comment out there on the Late Show debacle, purely from a trader’s point of view.

Jay Leno was and is NBC‘s top-producing, most consistent asset and they humiliated him twice in favor of other hosts.

First, in the early 90’s they made a failed play to give Letterman the time slot that Leno had earned.  They were lucky that the “trade” didn’t go through – Leno regularly kicks Dave’s ass in both the ratings and the demographics.  Not a few nights a week, but every night, like for years and years and years.

Next, they came out with some incredibly obnoxious announcement in 2004 that effectively sunsetted Leno’s time slot, promising it five years hence to Conan O’Brien.  So Leno spent the past five years as a lame duck if you will, then was moved into a primetime slot to compete against sitcoms, reality shows and serial scripted dramas.  The resulting disaster surprised no one except Team NBC.

The lesson is simple – Jay Leno is a blue chip, a core holding if you will.  You don’t screw around with with your Berkshire Hathaway position no matter how attractive Netflix or Steel Dynamics may look at the moment.

NBC trades like a first year desk assistant 2 days out of the training program.  Leno should tell them to go twist in the wind and do something online.

Oh, and as far as the “portfolio managers” who are making these decisions?  Maybe its time for NBC’s new owners at Comcast to find someone else to “run their money”.

OK, now read David Carr on the NBC disaster, he’s way more knowledgeable than me on this stuff:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/business/media/11carr.html?ref=business

Tags: , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. video transitions canva commented on Sep 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 70896 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  2. taxi to airport from cheltenham commented on Sep 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  3. eatverts.com commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  4. bitcoin era reviews 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  5. bitcoin evolution reviews 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  6. lace front wigs commented on Sep 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  7. facebook old layout commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  8. DevOps Services commented on Nov 05

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 99251 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  9. Automating performance tests commented on Nov 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  10. tangerine account log-in commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  11. Kenwood TKR-740 manuals commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]

  12. bandar77 commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2010/01/11/luckily-for-ge-nbcs-not-a-prop-trading-desk/ […]