Paul Wilmott on Britain's Windfall Banker Tax

They actually did it in Great Britain…

From the New York Times:

In Britain the first shots have just been fired by Alistair Darling, the chancellor of the Exchequer, our very own, very unlikely Wyatt Earp. On Wednesday he introduced a windfall tax of 50 percent to be paid by banks on discretionary bonuses above $40,000. (France is considering a similar tax.) So if a banker receives a million-dollar bonus, his bank will have to hand over $480,000. And he still pays income tax on the full million.

The idea is nice and simple. It is intended to encourage banks to retain cash, perhaps as a buffer against hard times. This makes a pleasant change from the depressing use of taxpayers’ money for the same purpose, which seems to be the current policy.

The White House is watching this development very closely and our banks know it.  This is the genesis behind everyone’s sudden insistence that they are healthy enough to pay back TARP.  It is also why Goldman Sachs just laid out its all-stock bonus policy for this year.

The priority for Wall Street firms right now is disentangling from the government and biding their time til the crisis abates so that the water coolers filled with champagne can once again be wheeled back in to the office.

Source:

Gone With The Windfall by Paul Wilmott (NYT)

Tags: , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. hr software commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 35129 more Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/12/13/paul-wilmott-on-britains-windfall-banker-tax/ […]

  2. repliki zegarkow commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 11959 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2009/12/13/paul-wilmott-on-britains-windfall-banker-tax/ […]