The Economist: Total Factor Productivity is China's Secret Sauce

In the latest issue of The Economist, we get a great article about why Productivity Growth is perhaps the single most important gauge of an economy’s strength.  More importantly, we read about Total Factor Productivity, a measure by which China leaves everyone in the dust.

Here’s what it’s all about…

A better gauge of an economy’s use of resources is “total factor productivity” (TFP), which tries to assess the efficiency with which both capital and labour are used. Once a country’s labour force stops growing and an increasing capital stock causes the return on new investment to decline, TFP becomes the main source of future economic growth. Unfortunately TFP is much harder to measure than labour productivity. It is calculated as the percentage increase in output that is not accounted for by changes in the volume of inputs of capital and labour. So if the capital stock and the workforce both rise by 2% and output rises by 3%, TFP goes up by 1%. Measuring hours worked is fairly easy, but different ways of valuing a country’s capital stock can produce different results.

So how does China’s TFP stack up against that of the rest of the world?


from The Economist

The OECD publishes figures for its rich-country members. These show that since 1990, average TFP growth has been remarkably similar in America, Japan, Germany, Britain and France, at around 1% a year. A recent report by Andrew Cates, an economist at UBS, attempts to estimate TFP growth in emerging economies over the past two decades (see chart). He calculates that China has had by far the fastest annual rate of TFP growth, at around 4%. Probably no other country in history has enjoyed such rapid efficiency gains.

It was interesting to see how unproductive BRIC nations Brazil and Russia have been based on this measure versus China and India.

Read the rest:

Economic Focus: Secret Sauce  (The Economist)

Tags: , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. bitcoin evolution review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: […]

  2. jessica rabbit sex dolls commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  3. btc loophole commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  4. Making Money Online commented on Sep 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  5. commented on Oct 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 37218 more Info to that Topic: […]

  6. commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  7. hotels reservations commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 74178 additional Info to that Topic: […]

  8. imitation rolex daytona winner 1992 commented on Dec 08

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 89897 additional Information to that Topic: […]

  9. human hair wigs commented on Dec 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  10. LG LP0813WNR manuals commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]