Eric Jackson on The Best Corporate Boards


If you don’t know Eric Jackson, he’s an activist shareholder through his fund Ironfire Capital and he also writes a terrific blog called Breakout Performance.

When a knowledgeable activist talks governance and the quality of corporate boards, I try to listen and learn something.

Jackson came upon something interesting during the course of his research to determine the best boards in America ( comes out on top btw)…and boy, I bet BusinessWeek wishes he hadn’t:

To help spark my thinking, I searched the Web for recent corporate rankings of the best boards in corporate America. I came across a list from BusinessWeek from 2000. The top board on the list was General Electric (GE Quote), which unseated Campbell Soup(CPB Quote). Others near the top were IBM(IBM Quote), Home Depot(HD Quote), Intel (INTC Quote) and Cisco(CSCO Quote).

Since this ranking was issued, the combined stock returns of this group has been down 60% vs. negative 37% for the S&P 500. Three of the worst boards in 2000 in the rankings — Walt Disney(DIS Quote), Rite Aid (RAD Quote) and Waste Management (WMI Quote) — actually have slightly outperformed the best boards in the nine years since, but still returning on average negative 54% .

The companies with the “worst boards” beat those with the “best boards”…and both severely underperformed the S&P 500.


Now are these results an indictment of the concept that “Board Quality” actually matters?

Possibly, or perhaps they just reinforce how absurd it is for magazines to run those “Stocks for the Next Ten Years” cover stories that they rely on so heavily to move copies at the newsstand (I’m lookin’ at you, Kiplinger).

The composition and independence of a company’s board does not give you an excuse to buy, blindfold and hold.

Anyway, Jackson’s rationale behind his rankings are both illuminating and timely as we await the next generation of stock leaders to emerge from the morass.

His full post is here:

Best In Class: America’s Top Boards (Breakout Performance)

Full Disclaimer:  I may be long or short any of the above mentioned companies at any time for either client or personal accounts.  If you’ve read this far down the page, then I would assume that you are intelligent enough not to trade or invest based on anything you read on a blog, including this one.  My commentary above is not an endorsement of Jackson’s fund or any of the companies mentioned.  See my Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.

Tags: , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Digital Transformation commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]

  2. official site commented on Feb 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: […]