Don't Blame the Repeal of Glass-Steagall…Blame Risk Management

Fortune Has Not Been Kind to Banks

Fortune Has Not Been Kind to Banks

Over on Breakingviews, Hugo Dixon is taking issue with those who believe bringing back some version of the Glass-Steagall Act would prevent the financial collapse we’re now fighting through every day.

Why would anybody run a casino and a utility under the same roof? That is the supposedly killer argument of those who want to bring back some variation of the Glass-Steagall Act.

Dixon’s basic argument is that you can’t just say, “Well, we let banks engage in investment-bank-like activity and they wrecked themselves in the casino”.  The truth is, the guys with the big trading losses weren’t really the traditional banks, they were the Bears, the Lehmans and the AIGs.

The traditional banks destroyed themselves primarily in the course of their regular business, lending!

True, these “universal” banks lost money in the casino. But they also lost pots of cash through straightforward bad lending. What’s more, there are plenty of other simple utility-like financial institutions that got into trouble: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the UK’s Northern Rock, Countrywide, Washington Mutual and Wachovia.

Since Clinton repealed Glass-Steagall in 1999, there have been scores of bank/broker combinations, mergers and spin-offs but when all was said and done, they must have laid off all the risk managers, because clearly, that’s what’s been missing.

If you don’t have strong risk management, or you do but you decide to ignore the internal naysayers in pursuit of hedge fund-like returns, then you end up like Citigroup, Glass-Steagall or not.

Full Article:  Controlling the Casino (Breakingviews)

Read Also:  Interview With the Ghost of JP Morgan

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. tes cpns untuk smk commented on Jan 31

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: […]