Goldman Sachs is a Charity Case, Too.

Goldman: Not So Special After All

Goldman: Not So Special After All

This is a very big story and will probably piss off taxpayers like nothing else has thus far.  The Wall Street Journal has the list of all the companies that were essentially made whole by the AIG bailout.  Basically, these are the firms that were counter-parties in transactions with AIG, the hedge fund that happens to be attached to an insurance company.

There have been rumors for months that the AIG bailout was really a Goldman Sachs bailout in disguise, and today, WSJ is reporting that both Goldman and Deutsche Bank received $6 billion of the AIG bailout money in the 4th quarter of 2008.

Ex-Goldman CEO and ex-Sec Treas. Hank Paulson‘s gonna have some ‘splainin’ to do (we hope).

Here’s the list of charity cases who benefited from the AIG rescue:

Goldman Sachs
Deutsche Bank
Merrill Lynch
Société Générale
Royal Bank of Scotland
Banco Santander
Morgan Stanley
Bank of America
Lloyds Banking Group

If you’re reading this, you’ll probably notice that your name isn’t on here, and neither is mine.  Apparently, when you or I do a bad trade or transaction, its basically our own problem.  Until our bad trades are in the billions of dollars, no one will care enough to take the burden from us.

And we were told that the point of bailing out AIG was to avoid systemic issues!  Well, the system is f@#$ed anyway and the market has officially been wiped out, so at this point, who cares about systemic risk?

Full Story:  Top Banks got $50 billion in AIG Aid

Dealbreaker’s Take

Barry’s Take

Tags: , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Login Area commented on Jan 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: […]