Your Oil Stocks Aren't Coming Back, Chulo


NASDAQ Composite, Spring 2000 to Spring 2003

Remember when Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Dell (DELL), Lucent (ALU), Yahoo (YHOO) and Cisco (CSCO) ruled the markets?  There was an era, roughly 1997 to 2000 when those stocks actually mattered.  They were important companies doing big things in terms of providing the technology needed for the next century’s communications and internet build-out.  And then, they just didn’t matter anymore.  Once the dot com bubble burst, every bounce or rally in these names was basically a selling opportunity…for 8 years and counting!  See the above chart for a notion of how frustrating it must have been to stay positive on NASDAQ tech names.

It took a long time for people to get it through their heads that these stocks had seen the best valuations and prices that they would ever see.  Investors couldn’t imagine a world where these stocks would no longer be important, but with each passing quarter and year, these NASDAQ Generals diminished in stature and market cap.

I believe that this story is repeating itself in the oil patch.  Market participants seem to be in a state of disbelief that Chesapeake (CHK), Transocean (RIG), National Oilwell Varco (NOV) and ConocoPhillips (COP) aren’t important anymore.  These stocks may have have seen the best levels they will ever see, at least for a long time.


OIH, the oil services ETF 4/2008 til today...sell rallies?

This is not to say that there won’t be phenomenal trading opportunities along the way.  If crude stages any kind of recovery, I’m sure these names and all of the others will bounce, but will the backlogs for the service companies and drillers ever be what they were in late 2007, early 2008?  I doubt it.  And will proven reserves ever be valued as they were during the bull market?

When the credit crunch hit the hedge funds, we saw a raft of speculative money come out of commodities across the board.  Then, industrial demand for oil literally disappeared from North America to China.  These two events revealed to many newbies what the old school oil traders already knew, that commodities (and the related stocks) could be more volatile than what many were prepared for.

The major difference between the aforementioned tech giants during the peak of the dot com bubble and the oil and gas stocks now, is that the tech giants were coming down from price-to-earnings multiples of 30, 40, even 50!  The reason they got that far ahead of themselves was that we were told that the growth would be unlimited and exponential.  In fact, earnings of any kind were a detriment, because they meant that a company was too worried about short-term profitability as opposed to grabbing share and eyeballs (seriously!).

The oil names, in contrast, are trading at absurdly low multiples, in fact, the average PE ratio on the 18 oil stocks that make up the Oil Services ETF (OIH) is only 5.08!  This low multiple reflects the fact that last year’s earnings were peak earnings in this very cyclical business.  Next year’s “E” is a giant unknown, but the market knows it ain’t going to stack up to when crude was over $100.

And so now, we will watch for years as these stocks grind it out in between the recent lows and the highs of yesteryear.  In the meantime, investors on both Wall Street and Main Street will gradually come to the realization that the Chesapeake position they put on at 70 will not be break-even any time soon (if ever).  In frustration, the hot money that came in but was too slow to sell closer to the top will come out, which makes all short-term rallies suspect in the entire sector.

I hope to see oil and natural gas prices find a nice equilibrium for consumers to be able to afford gas and for these great companies to be able to make money.  On bounces, I will look for quick trades in the better names.  That said, I won’t be placing any intermediate or long-term bets in the oil patch this year, as I believe that a once-in-a-generation parade has just gone past.

Sorry, bulls.  T. Boone Pickens may not live long enough to see his $300 oil prediction come true.

Full Disclosure:  I may be long or short any of the stocks mentioned for either client or personal accounts at any time.  The views expressed in this post are my own and are subject to change without notification.  Please do not construe this information as an invitation to buy or sell any securities.  I currently hold no position at all in OIH, nor do I endorse it’s ability to accurately represent the oil services sector.  Nothing written above should be viewed as research or a recommendation of any kind.  For a full disclaimer, please visit this site’s Terms and Conditions page.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. thenaturalpenguin commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  2. Vape Juice commented on Sep 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  3. immediate edge commented on Oct 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 94024 more Info to that Topic: […]

  4. DevOps as a Service commented on Nov 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: […]

  5. malaysia best online casino commented on Nov 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: […]

  6. Equation of quality commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

  7. Intelligent Automation Strategy commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  8. garage door repair sherwood park commented on Dec 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]