So Far, So Meh

Just wanted to revisit something I did on January 5th for a moment, from my year-opening post “You Are Here“. In it, I tried to come up with the most likely scenario for 2014 and I hit upon the 1994 analogy as my top guess:

1. The 1994 – A flattish, low volatility market in 2014 as the two opposing forces of reduced stimulus and slightly better-than-expected economic growth fight each other to a draw. Stocks go nowhere in the end with little gyration to speak of. Incidentally, this would be the outcome that frustrates the most players – all the passive index johnny-come-lately’s who require a rising tide don’t get it, all the long/short hedge funds and vol-starved traders don’t get their desert oasis in this scenario either. Bear in mind that many of us are beginning to use 1994 as our analog here and for good reason – it’s a mid-bull market year shortly after recession with a pickup in earnings but with interest rates beginning to rise as well. In ’94, you got 20% growth in S&P earnings but a flat market because rising rates led to a 25% compression in PE multiples. That particular rate hike cycle involved the Fed Funds Rate rising 300 basis points and it took place over 14 months. Once it was completed, in early 1995, the S&P 500 was off to the races for the next five years. I wouldn’t fall out of my chair if we went through something similar now as rates normalize and stocks digest huge gains. Consolidation is terrific and I certainly would much prefer to correct through time rather than through price any day of the week.

So far, this is pretty much what’s transpired as we come to the close of Q1. Rates haven’t exactly risen but expectations for rate hikes certainly have. Volatility has been minimal and stocks have largely done nothing – frustrating all but the most nimble.

As it stands, the US stock market looks to finish the first quarter of 2014 flat. See indices below, data via Morningstar through the close on Friday 3/28:

Screen Shot 2014-03-30 at 10.10.42 AM


On a price basis, the S&P 500’s gain is cut in half to just 50 basis points this year – and the composition of sectors that got it there ought to be quite troubling for the “new secular bull market” crowd. See chart below, via State Street SPDRs:

Screen Shot 2014-03-30 at 10.13.54 AM


Now let’s keep it real – sector leadership, in and of itself, is not at all predictive of what’s to come most of the time. The beginning of 2013 started off with a bang and the big leadership groups were also consumer staples, telecoms and utilities. If that caused you to sell, you missed one of the greatest years for stocks of all time – by mid-year consumer discretionaries, techs and industrials were more than happy to take the baton and power us higher. Anytime someone’s spinning a narrative around which sector is leading that particular day, change the channel – it’s a loser of a thesis.

Let’s talk about what’s happening right now…

Sometimes markets are fairly simple and intuitive: This year the economic data has been mixed and inconclusive, those betting on acceleration have so far been unrequited. The tapering of Fed stimulus has kept stock price multiple growth in check after a 20% + jump in PE ratios last year. Buyback activity has maintained its pace from the end of last year but the growth rate of new repurchase announcements has leveled off. Earnings have been good, not great, but margins are maxed out (9.5%!). Revenue growth will be the new buzzword as the Q2 season gets underway (institutional investors have begun to display and vocalize a clear preference for return ON capital versus financial engineering after five years of management caution). A lack of major catalysts ahead favors the “sell the rips” camp but, absent some major dislocation, it’s hard to see what could drive the unbiased observer to get crazy-bearish here – Ukraine? Mid-terms? Please.

A month-by-month look at how we’ve arrived at a flat-on-year outcome will be be instructive as well:

The January selloff (roughly 6% peak to trough) was largely driven by profit-taking and the massive rebalancing being executed by millions of investors and their advisors with tens of trillions under management – trimming gains on stocks and adding to bonds was a no-brainer at the year’s beginning. There was no news other than the weather, which sucked, to have precipitated the selling. This is a good reminder that compiling lists of major risks is entirely unnecessary because dips happen on no news also.

The February bounce was incredible. Participation ramped up, internals were fantastic and virtually everything began to climb back to the December 31st closing highs. We gained back 7% from the bottom for a total gain of 4.3% on the month, basically a rally in a straight line as the early, over-eager shorts who jumped on the January slide were barbecued once again. For old times’ sake 🙂

March was a motherf***er for just about everyone. On the one hand, you have the “popular” momentum stocks down enormously from their peaks – Twitter, Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, Tesla, Chipotle all smashed. On the other hand, JNJ and Microsoft were still breaking out to all-time or decade highs by month’s end, as though the carnage in the Cool Kids sectors was a distant ship’s smoke on the horizon (see what I did there?). In the meanwhile, the most popular sector for speculators in recent years – biotechnology – has just been absolutely pummeled. The Nasdaq Biotech Index was down 7% over the past week and 13% for the month. It’s worth noting that biotech stocks have doubled from 10% to almost 20% of the once-defensive healthcare sector in the last two years and they now represent 15% of the Nasdaq Composite’s market cap weighting. In other words, what was once a relatively obscure and idiosyncratically volatile corner of the market is now more influential on the bigger picture.

These cross-currents and contretemps are all quite jarring for even veteran market-watchers who need to come up with an explanation for this action. What does it all mean? 

Probably nothing. The easiest explanation is the simplest: Uninspiring economic progress, possibly driven by weather, collides with a slightly expensive stock market as investors digest massive gains from the year before. End of story.

Now what?


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. double your bitcoins review commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]

  2. Facebook Marketing commented on Oct 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  3. commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  4. bmo credit card login commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  5. rolex replica commented on Dec 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]