The Worst Year for Active Stockpickers in Three Decades

A continuing theme on this site for the last few years has been the futility of hiring stockpicking managers – especially in a mutual fund wrapper – and paying extra fees for their skills. It’s not that stockpickers aren’t smart or talented or hardworking or well-meaning. It’s that they cannot do what they profess to do on a consistent enough basis to justify the extra trading costs, management fees or tax ramifactions. This has been proven time and again by Morningstar ranking fails, the SPDJ Indices “persistence” studies and other ongoing research efforts.

According to Lipper, 2014 has shaped up to be the worst year in modern history for active stockpicking fund managers, with 85% of them failing to beat their benchmarks! It’s almost unbelievable. Imagine if only 15% of the autos sold by car companies didn’t drive. Imagine if airlines only got 15% of their flights to the destination on time. This is a massive fail for the investment management industry.

Reuters:

Some long-term advocates of active management may be turned off by the results, especially considering the funds’ higher fees. Through Oct. 31, index stock funds and exchange traded funds have pulled in $206.2 billion in net deposits.

Actively managed funds, a much larger universe, took in a much smaller $35.6 billion, sharply down from the $162 billion taken in during 2013, their first year of net inflows since 2007…

Derek Holman of EP Wealth Advisors, in Torrance, California, which manages about $1.8 billion, said his firm recently moved $130 million from a pair of active large cap funds into ETFs, saying it would save clients about $650,000 in fees per year.

So now what? Do active funds have a future? They could, if two conditions are met:

1. Management fees need to be cut in half. The average actively managed mutual fund in the US charges investors 1.35%, which is a joke in light of their efficacy in the aggregate.

2. Competition needs to walk away. So long as there are hundreds of thousands of CFAs all trying to do the same thing, the market will remain too efficient leading to too little alpha to go around. But who’s going to throw in the towel? No one until condition 1 really starts to happen.

 

 

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Welp… commented on Feb 29

    […] know 2014 was supposed to be the time. And then 2015 was going to be […]

  2. thenaturalpenguin.com commented on Sep 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 59024 more Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  3. คอนโดเงินเหลือ commented on Sep 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  4. how to find replica watches on dhgate commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 61417 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  5. EV commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  6. choice hotels commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  7. buy used Cars York commented on Dec 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]

  8. Sexy commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2014/11/28/the-worst-year-for-active-stockpickers-in-three-decades/ […]