Five questions for the Congressional hearings on GameStop, Reddit and Robinhood

I’ve offered my assistance to the House Financial Services Committee to prepare for their upcoming hearings concerning the GameStop, Reddit and Robinhood conflagration. I hope they take me up on it. Either way, here are the questions that the committee should be seeking answers to:

1. Is there any evidence that professional operators have infiltrated message boards and orchestrated these wild short squeezes or has this been an entirely grassroots phenomenon? How vulnerable are the millions of ordinary investors who rely on functioning markets to subsequent bouts of message board-driven mania?

2. Are there any records of conversations having taken place between hedge funds and Robinhood during the short squeeze episode? Were any requests or demands made to halt or slow down trading in the affected securities for the benefit of any parties?

3. What aspects of the Robinhood service or app should be reconsidered in light of the potential for fraud, abuse or massive losses inflicted upon the general public – even if those potential losses are self-inflicted by lack of education or experience? What safeguards should be adopted by fintech firms offering access to markets and speculation so that people are sufficiently warned about the risks they are taking?

4. What does it say about the state of our society and the current wealth inequality epidemic that millions of young people feel they need to resort to expressing their rage via brokerage account?

5. Did any hedge funds, market makers, private equity firms, broker-dealers or other sophisticated professional actors reap extraordinary profits as a result of taking advantage (or profiteering) from this episode?

What would you want to hear Congress ask? Tell me here.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.