The most annoying job in the investment biz

Just got finished reading this story at the Wall Street Journal and I still don’t understand it.

So, there’s a guy named Ben Meng who was in charge of the investments for Calpers, which is California’s gigantic public employees’ pension fund. And he also happened to own between $10,000 and $100,000 worth of Blackstone shares, which trades publicly. And during this time, Calpers hired Blackstone to run a part of its pension fund. Which, pretty much every large pension in America does. And without even deciding whether or not there was something problematic, he had to go.

Here’s WSJ:

There is no evidence that Mr. Meng attempted to benefit personally from his work at Calpers. Public officials can run afoul of state law simply by participating in government decisions that create the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Read that second sentence again. “Create the appearance” seems to be the problem. Blackstone manages $571 billion for institutional investors all over the country. It would be stranger if Calpers didn’t have any money with them.

Meng had disclosed his ownership of Blackstone shares before the decision was made for Calpers to allocate to the firm. Not good enough. Remember, we’re talking about appearances.

There’s a 13-person board that oversees the investment activities of the personnel at Calpers. I would imagine the whole thing is massively political. And now the board has to chase this guy out and cover their own asses. Even after he took action to get rid of the potential conflict:

Calpers didn’t flag any problems with Mr. Meng holding Blackstone shares until 2020, a person familiar with the matter said, and he subsequently sold the stock.

Meng was born in China and worked for the state’s foreign exchange team before coming here, working at Morgan Stanley and Barclays, then becoming an American citizen. This means he’s clearly talented, to have been able to do that with his career. It also opens brand new doors to even more politics.

Of all the jobs in the investment biz, this seems like it could be the most annoying and politically fraught. It’s only titularly about “investing” – there’s way too much other stuff that comes along with it that isn’t worth the aggravation.

People close to Mr. Meng said that even before the internal review the investment chief was worn down by the public spotlight.

No s***. I’m worn down just thinking about it. Now the grandstanding begins and the new rules and regs. It would have been easier to just tell employees they couldn’t own stock rather than have them trap themselves in a game of optics.


Calpers Faces Questions Following Investing Veteran’s Abrupt Exit (WSJ)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. regression testing commented on Jan 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  2. rbc online commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  3. white label software commented on Feb 03

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]