Why stock splits disappeared from our lives
Apple is splitting its stock 4-for-1 in two weeks. What does it mean for you? What might it mean for the broader market? And why have stock split announcements become so scarce in recent years? Did something change?
The peak of the stock split era was from 1995 through 2000. Investors were buying stocks specifically because they were about to split. It was one of the dopiest aspects of an already preposterously amateurish era of speculation and spectacle.
But there we were, buying stuff like Lycos and Excite@Home and SDLI Interactive as they crossed above 95 per share, eagerly awaiting the split announcement we knew would bring in the next wave of equally carefree buyers to replace us. The saddest part about the whole thing is that it actually worked. For awhile.
This year, over 40% of S&P 500 stocks are currently trading above 100. But almost none of them are undergoing a stock split. Why? In the new episode of my podcast,
The Compound Show, I attempt to answer the question, and I think I have it right.
What do you think?
Check it out on Apple / iTunes podcasts
Spotify, Google, Stitcher – Find your favorite podcasting app here.
Some further reading on the topic and some of the resources I mentioned:
Stock Splits Pay Off—on the Rare Occasions They Occur (WSJ)
What the Apple Stock Split Means (WSJ)
The Propensity to Split and CEO Compensation (John Carroll University)
The Market Reaction to Stock Split Announcements: Earnings Information After All (U of Illinois)
Informed trading around stock split announcements: evidence from the option market (Monash University)
Here’s why Apple’s stock split might not be so bullish for its shares (MarketWatch)
Wall St.’s split personality (CNNMoney)
Stocks Splitting Amid Soaring Markets (Los Angeles Times)
INVESTING; The Math of Stock Splits: 1 + 1 = 2, or Maybe More (NYT)
This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.
The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.
References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.
Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers
Please see disclosures