Valuation since the late 1990’s – win any argument with your friends!

JPMorgan Asset Management’s new On The Minds of Investors piece takes a look at “framing”, a behavioral bias that affects our judgments about market prices. Where you choose to start counting from will have a big impact on how you feel and what arguments will appeal to you.

For instance:

What level of returns should we expect from equity markets? The answer changes depending on the time period – when investors allow an incomplete picture to influence their decisions, it is an example of framing. While it appeared the market had climbed to untenable highs post-GFC (Exhibit 1), if we take a slightly longer view, the overall market return was actually flat between 2000 and 2012. During that time period, the market had an average annual total return of 0.6% per year and a cumulative total return of 6.8% – effectively a sideways market.

JPM’s Samantha Azzarello notes that if you were simply move the frame and look at returns from March 2009-March 2020, you’d see 18.5% annually for the S&P 500, a remarkable run compressed into that 11 year period of time – the opposite of the 2000-2012 experience.

So here’s our Chart o’ the Day for today:

Josh here – beside the framing issue, which allows you to win any argument with your friends that you’d like (it’s run too far! No, it’s got room!) what I find most interesting is the wide variety of market multiples since I began investing and trading in the late 1990’s.

I’ve seen forward PE’s for the S&P 500 range from a high of 27 early in my career to a low of 10! Which tells you that even if you could guess at the earnings of the market a year ahead of time, it would be impossible to figure out exactly what price multiple your fellow investors will put on that earnings number through the process of their buying and selling. And it’s not as though you could actually guess the earnings number anyway.

So now imagine how hard it is to calculate a year-end forecast, with those two variables sloshing around all year, one based on changing fundamentals and the other based on changing sentiment. Cannot be done!


Framing: How do investors interpret equity market returns over time? (JPMorgan Asset Management) 


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. dumps pin sites commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]