Closest to the customer vs suppliers

This week Apple confirmed that it would begin shipping products with chips it designs by itself. They’re replacing chips that Intel used to make for them and they claim the graphics performance will now be better. We already know they’ll save money. One analyst estimates that Apple is now making 42% of the iPhone’s components by itself versus only 8% five years ago. That’s a dramatic shift.

I was thinking about this concept in terms of the wealth management industry. One of the big trends you’re going to see is more proprietary investment strategies from large RIA firms. They’ll use technology and direct indexing platforms to build their own versions of the popular ETFs they currently use. Why bother? Customization for each client, tax loss harvesting opportunities, ESG overlays, there are a lot of possibilities when you can build your own index-like strategies and fine-tune, as well as market them as proprietary. I don’t think ETFs have anything to worry about. They’ll always be the simplest option and the default vehicles for most investors / investment advisors. I just think there’s something sexier and more advanced that’s going to capture a whole bunch of share going forward.

Apple knows a very big thing. It knows that iPhone buyers don’t really care whose chips and transistors are in the phone. They just want the phone and they have the relationship with Apple. Not with Qualcomm or Intel.

Advisors know this too. Very few advisors market themselves as resellers of a particular fund supplier. I know there are “Vanguard guys” and “Dimensional shops” but that’s going away. Vanguard’s not the only provider of cheap index products anymore and they’ve begun offering advice directly. Dimension just announced they’re going to start launching their own ETFs for the first time ever, which takes the whole “exclusivity” appeal away from RIAs who are in the fold. Advisors aren’t marketing the components they use to clients. They’re selling themselves. The components are beside the point. Clients will almost never choose an advisor strictly on the basis of what fund families comprise that advisor’s asset allocation model.

I get into this topic and more on the new episode of my podcast, The Compound Show. New episodes go up every Friday morning. I’ve spent the summer revamping the podcast and now it’s going to be a big focus of mine going forward. Hit the links below to get it on your favorite podcast app. And be sure to leave me a rating and review, it helps a lot 🙂

Apple / iTunes




Or listen here:

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. tangerine bank canada signin commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 4238 more Info on that Topic: […]