Stop doing stupid stuff with your money

Here’s WTI Crude Oil versus the USO ETF that’s meant to track it over the long, long term. Directionally it’s okay sometimes and then sometimes it isn’t. It’s a fifteen year old attempt at something that probably should have been retired a long time ago.

In the lower pane, you can see the range in correlation, which is all over the map:

If you’re sophisticated enough to need / want to trade commodities, then trade commodities with futures the way professionals do. If you want exposure to a commodity but you’re self-aware enough to understand that you’re unsophisticated, then you can get that exposure in the equities market.

I think GLD is the only commodity tracking exchange traded fund I can think of that provides a suitable direct exposure, but this is because its shares represent physical quantities of the metal, in storage, available for audit / inspection and not reliant on rolling over futures contracts. Okay, maybe throw in SLV, I’m not sure.

The guys at Grayscale are doing Bitcoin via “physical” by buying actual Bitcoin as money comes into their trust, as opposed to rolling Bitcoin futures contracts. I’m okay with this too, if you must, but the GBTC has an enormous premium over its NAV versus the underlying Bitcoins’ price because of how few other choices institutions have to get direct exposure in traditional brokerage accounts.

But the oil and gas stuff, the agriculture stuff, it just doesn’t work that way. The ETF sponsors are not sitting on vaults full of physical commodities to “back up” the dollar value of their funds. Investors are relying on the sponsors to be able to trade their way into representation of front-month tracking of commodity prices and it’s really, really hard to do in an ETF wrapper. Should oil prices rebound, it’s not clear that investors in USO will capture all of that / any of that rebound. They most definitely captured enough of the crash.

I’m not just saying this now because oil has crashed and the USO ETF is in a bind. I’m not a Monday morning quarterback on this topic. I have been saying this for almost a decade. There’s a worthwhile debate over whether or not investors need to have commodities as part of their portfolio. They represent a diversified return stream that can be uncorrelated with stocks and bonds.

Commodity “investing” – distinct from commodity trading – became fashionable in the aught’s decade while the emerging markets were in building mode and US stocks were having a lost decade of returns. Long commodities as a theme has not been going well over the last decade. But, if that’s a return stream you really feel that you need, this ain’t the way to get it.

Michael and I talk more about USO here:

And read my friend Izzy in the FT:

Can the USO fund collapse? (FT)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Eat Verts commented on Sep 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. La Licorne Beauté avis commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  3. gym mix 2021 commented on Nov 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  4. how to order marijuana online commented on Nov 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 65767 additional Information to that Topic: […]

  5. hotwire hotels commented on Nov 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  6. regression testing solutions commented on Nov 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]

  7. Kampala International University commented on Dec 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: […]

  8. Electrolux ERB34301X8 manuals commented on Jan 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  9. ρεπλικα commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]