Stocks prices are a proxy for our beliefs about the future

One of the most aggravating things I’m forced to listen to from time to time is people citing widely available valuation ratios as though their very existence has some sort of meaning for the future price of a particular stock. Such and such company is selling for only 15x earnings, therefore it’s cheap and you should buy it. 

This ignores the fact that any information available to the masses is already priced in and that markets, which are made up of hundreds of millions of participants, have settled on buying and selling a given security at its current price or valuation for a reason. Markets are very smart, which is not the same as saying they’re always right.

Such and such stock sells at 15 times earnings because, at the current moment, this is the equilibrium price at which sellers and buyers have reached a tacit agreement.

Citing a PE ratio is like remarking on the fact that it’s cold in Antarctica and hot in Africa.

What investors are really doing is attempting to divine the future prospects of a company and what they think it could someday be worth, and then placing their bets accordingly. Current valuations are useful in this endeavor only insofar as they present buyers and sellers with a an approximate baseline or a starting point.

And then from there, literally anything can happen.

Netflix has just become the largest publicly traded media company in the country today, surpassing both content giant Disney and distribution giant Comcast in one shot. These securities are not being traded at their current levels because of ratio of price to current earnings. Rather investors and traders in both securities are making a bet on what the future looks like, incorporating possible risks to their forward-looking assessments and then either buying or selling depending on how far away prevailing prices are from their own individual guesses.

And then there are some other tangential considerations that go into this stew – optics (do I want to show my fund’s shareholders that I am in this name?), benchmarks (should I own more or less of these stocks than the index I am judged against), taxes (I have a huge gain, no sense in selling before it’s been at least a year), apathy (I hardly look at my stocks, just let them do what they do), short-termism (I’m up 10% this month, nobody ever went wrong taking a profit), peer pressure (everyone’s getting rich in that stock, I need some), exogenous reasons (I’ll sell here to pay for my daughter’s wedding),  etc.

And this is before we add in all of the algorithmic buying and selling – activity that is utterly divorced from any sort of rhyme or reason and inhabits a digital realm of 1’s and 0’s. A game so completely impervious to your need for an explanatory narrative that no attempt to ascribe meaning to each day’s activity could ever, in a million years, bring you one iota of satisfaction.

If all this randomness, multiplied by all the guesses being made about the future, is too disorderly for you or its imprecision is offensive to your refined sensibilities, then this is not a game you ought to be playing. If the non-existence of a calculation or formula to slash through all of the considerations I’ve listed above is frustrating for you, then you should be aware that it has always been thus and it will never change. Surrender Dorothy.

The Netflix vs Comcast example is worth wrapping things up with…

Last year, Comcast did $85 billion in revenues and reported profits of $22 billion.

Last year, Netflix did $11.7 billion in revenues and reported profits of $550 million.

Both companies now have a market value of just under $150 billion dollars. Netflix has seen it’s market capitalization surpass Comcast, despite the fact that the latter company had roughly seven times higher sales last year and forty times profits.

And yet, here we are (chart via Bloomberg):

Both companies have announced big plans for 2018 and beyond, but investors have shown a clear and obvious proclivity to want to believe in Netflix’s future moreso than they do the future of Comcast. Whether investors are making a wise or a foolish bet is besides the point and entirely dependent on things that are beyond our ability to know in advance.

But what is not up for debate is whether or not the mere notice of a current valuation ratio is in any way determinant of what’s to happen with a given company’s share price.

Netflix has never been cheaper than Comcast. Comcast has never been more expensive than Netflix.

And yet the more expensive stock with substantially lower sales and earnings has gained over 30,000% since coming public over the last 16 years while the cheaper, more established company has gained merely 255% over the same period of time.

The recitation of a stock’s current valuation tells you absolutely nothing about its future price, but it tells you an awful lot about the prevailing sentiment around a company’s prospects. Stock prices are a proxy for our beliefs about the future.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Parasols kopen online commented on Oct 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: […]

  2. Performance automation testing commented on Nov 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

  3. td canada online commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on that Topic: […]

  4. rolex real vs fake stems commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  5. scotiabank online commented on Dec 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  6. Regression testing commented on Dec 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: […]

  7. bandar togel terpercaya commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 9304 more Info on that Topic: […]

  8. cibc banking commented on Jan 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]