The Morningstar Response

Yesterday I took a look at the harsh takedown Wall Street Journal published about Morningstar’s fund ratings system.

Jeffrey Ptak wrote the official response, which I think makes some important points.

Probably their biggest and best defense is to say, using the WSJ’s own data, that five star funds were less likely to fail than 1 star funds. However, this is intuitive; a 1-star fund gets that¬†ranking because its performance sucked before the fact. Fund companies will shut those products down rather than use marketing dollars to support them. So of course they are more likely to die than a five star fund, which attained its ranking thanks to good historical performance.

Anyway, here it is:

 

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. immediate edge reviews 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  2. bitcoin loophole review 2020 commented on Sep 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 55693 more Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  3. td bank easy web commented on Nov 10

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 83467 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  4. knockoff grande complication iwc commented on Nov 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

Read this next.