The Morningstar Response

Yesterday I took a look at the harsh takedown Wall Street Journal published about Morningstar’s fund ratings system.

Jeffrey Ptak wrote the official response, which I think makes some important points.

Probably their biggest and best defense is to say, using the WSJ’s own data, that five star funds were less likely to fail than 1 star funds. However, this is intuitive; a 1-star fund gets that ranking because its performance sucked before the fact. Fund companies will shut those products down rather than use marketing dollars to support them. So of course they are more likely to die than a five star fund, which attained its ranking thanks to good historical performance.

Anyway, here it is:

 

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. sell my car york commented on Dec 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  2. 먹튀아웃 commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 72248 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  3. fake watches commented on Jan 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  4. cbd for anxiety commented on Jan 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 54957 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  5. Regression Testing commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 8973 additional Info on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]

  6. cibc on line banking commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 72570 more Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/10/26/the-morningstar-response/ […]