Could Amazon Spur a CapEx Boom Rather Than Disinflation?

Just turning over an idea in my mind right now about the real implications of Amazon’s recently announced deal to buy Whole Foods and expand dramatically into the physical retail world…

The current popular idea about Amazon’s influence in the economy – held by me as well – is that it is disinflationary. It is driving competitors out of business, cutting out costs for consumers (read: eliminating profits for middlemen) and putting people out of work at brick and mortar stores at a far faster rate than it is creating fulfillment center / IT jobs. There are now Fed officials openly admitting that the internet is partly responsible for the central bank’s inability to engender wage growth and price inflation.

But could it end up working the other way ’round? Could the challenge of competing with Amazon actually end up spurring a boom in R&D, CapEx and other forms of longer-term corporate investment?

A recent piece at the Harvard Business Review hints at this possibility…

To give you a sense of the expense required, Amazon spends over $16 billion (11.8% of sales) on “technology and content.” This is not all innovation R&D or IT, but it’s mostly that. Meanwhile, Gartner reports that retail and wholesale companies spend about 1.5% of sales on IT. (Most of my retail clients seem to fall into the 2%–3% range.) Research and advisory firm IHL Group recently asked top retail CIOs how much their IT budgets are currently increasing and how much they should increase to compete against Amazon. The answer: Budgets are growing by 4.7% but would need to increase 87% to 237% to start closing the gap.

The author is Darrell K. Rigby, who is a partner at Bain & Company – he heads the firm’s global innovation and retail practices.


Last week the retail world learned the limitations of predictive planning compared with adaptive innovation in an increasingly unpredictable market. This week retailers will need to rapidly and radically adapt their lists of strategic initiatives, the prioritization and sequencing of those initiatives, as well as the speed and funding of their execution. We’ll know traditional retailers are getting it right when announcements of breakthrough innovations start driving their stock prices up, finally raising doubts about Amazon’s ability to respond.

The general idea is that not every retailer is simply going to stick to their original plans of perfecting a single-digit growth rate, single-digit profit margin company. Some of these organizations are going to break the mold – in innovative ways – in order to survive. Others will take bigger risks, a la Walmart buying to revamp its ecommerce efforts. All of these measures will require investment.

Younger investors haven’t yet seen a Capital Expenditure bubble. What went in the mid-aught’s was a debt and real estate bubble and what’s going on now is a buyback bubble. (Yes, everything is a bubble).

But in the mid- to late 1990’s, we had the CapEx bubble to end all CapEx bubbles (involving computers and wireless telephony), and it was good for the economy (for awhile). The 1950’s featured an infrastructure CapEx bubble (the Interstate Highway System), the 1960’s had its “Space Age” CapEx bubble and the late 1800’s enjoyed a railroad CapEx bubble.

These spending sprees were unlike the debt bubble of the 2003-2007 period in that, when the dust settled, at the very least they had left something useful behind (roads, rails, fiber optics, jets and rocket technologies). The last bubble we had only left behind unpaid loans and financial losses.

I’m all for another CapEx bubble if it’ll boost wages and increase the likelihood of there being more than one company left standing in the consumer economy, which represents 70% of US GDP.

Just a thought.

The Amazon–Whole Foods Deal Means Every Other Retailer’s Three-Year Plan Is Obsolete (HBR)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Curated Reads #20 | Curated Reads commented on Aug 05

    […] on the Amazon is eating us all up trail, could be just the thing that kickstarts a new capex cycle. Then again, retail has been in the doldrums for sometime […]

  2. bitcoin trading software commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 90839 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  3. Smith and Wesson Firearms for Sale commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 13655 additional Information on that Topic: […]

  4. copy used patek watches commented on Oct 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here to that Topic: […]

  5. rolex 69173 real or fake commented on Nov 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: […]

  6. rbc banking sign in commented on Dec 04

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  7. Regression testing commented on Dec 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]

  8. replica rolex commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  9. nbc canada commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 83373 more Information to that Topic: […]