This is what we’re dealing with

via Upshot:

A sizable minority of Americans don’t understand that Obamacare is just another name for the Affordable Care Act.

This finding, from a poll by Morning Consult, illustrates the extent of public confusion over a health law that President Trump and Republicans in Congress hope to repeal.

In the survey, 35 percent of respondents said either they thought Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act were different policies (17 percent) or didn’t know if they were the same or different (18 percent). This confusion was more pronounced among people 18 to 29 and those who earn less than $50,000 — two groups that could be significantly affected by repeal.

Don’t laugh. These are your friends and neighbors.

These are the people who are electing government officials and indirectly supporting legislation that works against their own self-interest, because a cable news program told them to. These are the people vociferously shouting their uninformed opinions on every Facebook page and street corner in America.

And, of course, these are the people being offered “increased choice” by the possible repeal of the Fiduciary Standard of care for retirement accounts. They are the people who are allegedly able to make good decisions for themselves with retirement on the line. They’re the people who once had pensions guaranteeing them an income in retirement, who are now expected to make investment decisions on their own in order to replicate those pensions. They’re people who will live longer than prior generations and are at significant risk of outliving their money as a result. They are people for whom the introduction of increased choice will not be a benefit, given the fact that excess choice leads to paralysis or poor decision-making.

They’re the people who are buying insurance products for a guaranteed income when what they really need is enough growth from low-cost equity exposure to outstrip inflation – not a nominal, fixed payment. All of the incentives are in place for salespeople to trick them into doing this to themselves. The incentives to deliver good advice are considerably lower, or non-existent in many cases.

This is what we’re dealing with. If you’re a financial professional and you’re reading this, you have a chance to fight for the right side to help these people. Even if they spit empty, oxymoronic political slogans in your face while you try.

Don’t give up. The rewards for being on the right side of this fight will someday transcend commissions and fees.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. click here commented on Sep 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  2. Cannabis Oil for Sale commented on Oct 13

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  3. SEO commented on Oct 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 15280 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  4. scotiabank online commented on Nov 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  5. rbc sign in online commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  6. Harold Jahn commented on Dec 20

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 10371 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  7. human hair wigs commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  8. CI CD Services commented on Jan 15

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  9. scotiabank banking commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]

  10. tangerine business account signin commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2017/02/08/this-is-what-were-dealing-with/ […]