Not a day goes by where I don’t give thanks to Providence for placing me in a position to be doing something I believe in for a living. it wasn’t always thus.
Today, a major Wall Street investment bank released a report in which they downgrade the outlook for US stocks for the next 3 months.
Here’s Goldman Sachs, in a nutshell:
Our risk appetite indicator is near neutral levels and its positive momentum has faded, suggesting positioning will give less support and we will need better macro fundamentals or stimulus to keep the risk rally going, but market expectations are already dovish and growth pick-up should take time.
As a result, we downgrade equities tactically to Underweight over 3 months, but remain Neutral over 12 months. We remain Overweight cash and would look for resets lower in equities to add positions.
Translation: “Maybe stocks will fall and you should buy them if they do.”
I don’t even know what to say about something like this. Is it possible that people are actually placing trades based on someone’s feelings and selective interpretation of a narrow slice of data might lead to the ability foresee 90 days worth of random stock market activity?
There are myriad concerns in the market these days surrounding the fact that, with record low bond yields and high stock prices, a diversified portfolio may not shield a traditional asset allocation portfolio from a drop. We agree, which is why we manage a tactical model alongside a strategic model for many of our clients. Our tactical model is rules-based and is only as good as our fidelity to the rules allows it to be. These other inputs have to be tuned out in order for it to work.
Should we step off the ledge and start reacting to these kinds of “It’s going to be a rough 90 days because of post-Brexit positioning and risk appetites and valuations and economic growth data and the expectations therein and etc, etc, etc” then. surely, we would be back in the land of Wizardry and Witchcraft that I spent more than a decade learning to escape from.
But we will not play that game with our money or other people’s money. It’s better to accept the possibility of short-term volatility than to jeopardize the long-term on a quest with the seers and shamans of The Street.
[…] Brown explains (Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] Brown explains ( Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft ) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] Brown explains (Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] term, when the market plus back it may not feel good but you can still sleep well at night – Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft. If you don’t know your goals and time frames before hand, statements like this will scare […]
[…] players and teams has been found wanting, not that those whose day has passed, committed to wizardry and witchcraft as they are, have recognized […]
[…] players and teams has been found wanting, not that those whose day has passed, committed to wizardry and witchcraft as they are, have recognized […]
[…] Here you will find 20036 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
I’m a New York City-based financial advisor at Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. I help people invest and manage portfolios for them. For disclosure information please see here.
Get a Full Investor Curriculum: Join The Book List
Every month you'll receive 3-4 book suggestions--chosen by hand from more than 1,000 books. You'll also receive an extensive curriculum (books, articles, papers, videos) in PDF form right away.
[…] Brown explains (Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] Brown explains ( Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft ) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] Brown explains (Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft) why you should not attempt to imitate big-firm pronouncements by following their […]
[…] term, when the market plus back it may not feel good but you can still sleep well at night – Rules-based tactical vs wizardry and witchcraft. If you don’t know your goals and time frames before hand, statements like this will scare […]
[…] players and teams has been found wanting, not that those whose day has passed, committed to wizardry and witchcraft as they are, have recognized […]
[…] players and teams has been found wanting, not that those whose day has passed, committed to wizardry and witchcraft as they are, have recognized […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 96664 more Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 20036 additional Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 93120 more Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/08/01/rules-based-tactical-vs-wizardry-and-witchcraft/ […]