Confusing Sophistication with Substance

Here’s the pitch – at current valuations and prevailing interest rates, neither stocks nor bonds will offer much in the way of returns.

In the meanwhile, your pension fund has an embedded liability of high single-digits per annum, and you’ll need some pretty sophisticated strategies in order to achieve them.

We in the alternative investment community have those strategies. We’re obviously smart, and incredibly well-dressed. Our office is on 57th Street, one thousand feet above the city. Are you getting the message? 

And the kicker – taking meetings with us is going to be like visiting a salon filled with Enlightenment Age intellectuals in 18th century Paris. We’ll talk convexity and curve-steepeners and sortino ratios and term premia until the hairs on your arm stand up from the erudition and electricity in the room.

And don’t even get me started on the massive booklets of charts and data we’ll pile onto your desk. You’ll be utterly dazzled by the 4th page, in an ecstatic trance by the 400th.

Also, you’ll never be fired, because we’re on the platform. We’re on every platform. Everyone else you are benchmarked against is also using us. We’re on platforms of platforms. Forget about it.

***

Here’s the result, via Bloomberg:

New York City’s Employees Retirement System, whose members include sanitation workers, librarians and nurses, is one of five New York City public employee pensions. The funds had combined assets of $154.4 billion as of Jan. 31. NYCERS board is made up of trustees representing the mayor, comptroller, public advocate, five borough presidents and three unions.

Last year, NYCERS hedge fund portfolio lost 1.88 percent, lagging both the Standard & Poor’s 500 the Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Three-year returns were 2.83 percent.

But the dinners were great.

***

I’m going to go out on a limb and just mention that a pension fund, or charitable fund, or endowment fund, is just a large collection of individual investors who’ve had their money pooled with the hopes of reaching specific goals. It doesn’t follow that this pool of assets should require anything more outrageously brilliant than what intelligent high net worth investors are doing.

It doesn’t require a pie graph with 65 slices. It doesn’t require being both long and short against every asset class. It doesn’t require shareholder activism or aggressive interest rate bets or a hedge against the potential volatility of every conceivable exposure.

We started an institutional division last year because we believe that sub-$100 million funds are getting terrible advice, en masse, because of what they think is necessary.

These funds do not get access to the top private equity shops, the brightest venture capital managers or the top hedge funds. Instead, they get access to the fourth best. Or the fifth best. Unfortunately, the fourth and fifth best of each of these categories still charge fees as though they’re the first best. The results are predictable: Great presentations and lots of disappointment.

And even if they could have access to the best alternatives – like NYC’s pension system surely does – would it even help?

Ben Carlson, our director of institutional asset management, came to us with a very powerful idea when we hired him: What if we could bring clarity, evidence-based investing, at a reasonable cost, to the small and mid-market funds all over the country? What if we could slice through all the artifice and showmanship with data and common sense?

Something tells me that’s where the puck is heading, where it will be in the years ahead. Something tells me Ben is onto something big. And man, was he the right person for the job. Ben’s seen every pitch imaginable, having sat on the client side of the table for ten years. He’s even enjoyed the dinner conversation.

As institutions stop confusing sophistication with substance, there will be real answers sought. Smart consultants will recognize the opportunities that exist in providing them.

Learn more about what we’re doing for this market here.

Read also:

Confessions of an Institutional Investor (TRB)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Market Reads | SCOTT'S INVESTMENTS commented on Apr 14

    […] Confusing Sophistication with Substance Best Explanation Ever About How Bottoms Form Four expansive reads on factor investing Simple vs Complex A Wealth of Common Sense: Trading Costs & The New Market Averages The Most Complicated Stocks What Do Share Buybacks Really Tell Us About the Stock Market Are European Stocks Cheap or is the U.S. Expensive? How To Pick The Right ETF How Institutional Investors Use ETFs ETF.com: Swedroe: Annuities & Problems Of Longevity | ETF.com Swedroe: Passive Investing Without Indexes | ETF.com Daily ETF Watch: Cambria Takes New Angles | ETF.com Swedroe: Value Beats Glamour | ETF.com How To Trade Leveraged ETFs | ETF.com Investor Field Guide: The More Unique Your Portfolio, The Greater Its Potential Alpha or Assets  Meb Faber: Minimum Loss Portfolio | Meb Faber Research – Stock Market and Investing Blog How Much Do You Have in Foreign Bonds? Probably Zero. | Meb Faber Research – Stock Market and Investing Blog How Does a Market Get Cheap? The P in P/E | Meb Faber Research – Stock Market and Investing Blog EconomPic: EconomPic: Active Management is Far From Dead EconomPic: What You Pay Matters Less than What You’re Paying For Alpha Architect: Update on the Valuation Metric Horserace: 2011-2015 – Alpha ArchitectAlpha Architect Smart Beta: Data Mining, Arbitraged Away, Or Here To Stay? – Alpha ArchitectAlpha Architect Have benchmarks made us bad active investors? – Alpha ArchitectAlpha Architect Smart Beta Analysis: Know What You Own – Alpha ArchitectAlpha Architect Systematic Relative Strength: Crowdsourcing Investment Decisions – Systematic Relative Strength Most investing is simple, but we complicate it.  Systematic Relative Strength  Others:   Before You Trash Smart Beta… Chasing Momentum | PensionPartners.com Snake Oil and Low Volatility Investing- Factor Investor Myth Busting: Stock Buybacks aren’t Propping up the Stock Market | Pragmatic Capitalism The Optimal Allocation to Managed Futures | RCM’s Attain Alternatives Blog Beware bad multi-factor products | NEWFOUND RESEARCH BLOG – Flirting with Models™ Parents, Beware: Your Children Will Invest Like You Do – The Experts – WSJ […]

  2. pinewswire.net commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  3. local window washing commented on Oct 02

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  4. cum sa faci commented on Oct 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  5. realcouchtuner.com commented on Nov 30

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  6. td easy web commented on Dec 06

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  7. Regression Testing Solutions commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  8. Poulan Power chainsaws manuals commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]

  9. Login Area commented on Jan 29

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/04/14/confusing-sophistication-with-substance/ […]