My Super Tuesday Reaction


Here are the Super Tuesday results, in case you need the details. I wrote a spiel about my take, please don’t take this as me pretending to be an expert on politics.

Let me start by saying that this is not now, nor has it ever been, a political blog. I don’t affiliate with any party and my leanings could probably best be described as “Centrist Anarchist”. By which I mean, I’d prefer to see the extreme wings of both parties burned to the ground, with a technocratic moderate coming along to run things pragmatically.

Don’t worry – we’re in no danger of that happening anytime soon šŸ™

In 2008, I wanted to see John McCain win. In 2012, I was rootingĀ for Mitt Romney.

Both men were moderates who were forced to say and do ridiculousĀ things to curry favor with the extremists who now control the GOP.

McCain was talked into Palin as a running mate who would “energize” the party’s insane base. He also thought he had to run based on the “soundness” of Bush’s economy, which by the fall of 2008 was obviously crashing. Romney was forced to repudiate his signature achievement as the governor of Massachusetts, the state’s health careĀ reform, and it was the wrong time to run a private equity billionaire, despite his inherent decency and steady demeanor.

So, we got Obama. Twice. Fine. And the Republicans treated him disrespectfully for 8 years and went about their business as though he hadn’t been legitimately elected. This is one of the primary reasons for why there’s been a counterproductive fiscal response (or non-response) to the great recession and the Fed was left to pick up the slack in the form of its experimental QE policies. The drag from state, local and federal government layoffs probably held the recovery back from its full potential all this time.

The stock market went bananas, as did real estate, as a result of the Fed’s efforts to reflate, but this hasn’t helped the bulk of Americans in the same way that a strong economy with real wage growth would have. This election’s dynamics are the result.

The stock market began to feel more confident about Hillary Clinton after her first few primary and caucus wins and began to rally. It ran up furiously yesterday as word came out from around the country that Super Tuesday would be a victory for her (or a defeat for the anti-business Bernie Sanders).

Make no mistake, Hillary Clinton is the stock market’s choice. She has key relationships with all the large investment banks and has always been friendly with the stewards who watch over big pools of money, both at home and abroad. She represents a continuation of the status quo, a throwback to the fondly-remembered 1990’s and the best chance for regulatory and tax policy continuity.

She also guarantees gridlock with a Republican congress that’s been gerrymandered like a well-marbled ribeye steak. Stocks like gridlock. Look it up.

And you can feel free to disregard her rhetoric about Valeant and the pharmaceutical “price-gouging” that earns her big applause on the trail. She’s just saying whatever she has to in order to squeeze the daylight from between her positions and Bernie’s. Her husband was bashing drug companies during his campaign too. The drug stocks fell and then snapped back when the campaign was over. It went on toĀ become an incredible decade of gains for pharma investors.

The Clintons’ approach to politics can be best summed up with the word expedience. They are the anti-Cruz. I don’t say that like it’s a bad thing. Obstructionism, even if coming from a pure, conscientious place, is not going to help us. Unfortunately, it’s the only playbook that Cruz and the Tea Party seem to want to work from. What Cruz attempted to do to this country during the debt ceiling crisis makes him every bit as unfit as Trump is from a temperament perspective.

Also, I just don’t like him. Neither does anyone else.

We haven’t heard the last of Marco Rubio either, although I would have been okay with him as the nominee this time around (there’s still a long shot, they say).

My thing with Rubio is that I don’t believe he has fully-formed ideas on a lot of things yet. He’s young and had very little economic and foreign policy experience in his role as a senator in Florida. My guess is that, as the GOP’s nominee, he would have shifted center-right and offered Clinton a real challenge among undecideds / independents. He’s handsome, likable, youthful, has a nice looking family and would probably start saying much smarter things once his advisor situation got an upgrade.

But if it’s to be Clinton vs Trump, and Clinton can outclass the Trump machine between now and the fall, the stock market may get its way in the end. I think we’re seeing that realization start to dawn on the ever fretful investor class these days. Thankfully, there will be something new to worry about soon enough.

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this ā€œpostā€ (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Eat Verts commented on Sep 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]

  2. immediate edge review 2020 commented on Sep 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  3. older dating commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]

  4. Sig Sauer commented on Oct 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: […]

  5. replica cheapest imitation bulgari commented on Oct 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]

  6. ė‰“ķ† ė¼ commented on Dec 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: […]

  7. cheap wigs commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]

  8. Regression testing services commented on Jan 17

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]

  9. daftar togel online commented on Jan 23

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: […]

  10. Agile DevOps commented on Feb 07

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]