Tactics won’t matter when your strategy sucks

“You cannot run a political campaign and not have the ability to adapt, to pivot,” one longtime Bush donor who has supported all five of the family’s presidential campaigns. “To sit there and say, ‘We have a book,’ just shows the immaturity.”

The Jeb! strategy, laid out in a “playbook” a year ago, was to fight the battle on the Bushes’ own terms and to rely on the deference he was owed as an establishment elder with organizational prowess across the country.

Great strategy, wrong environment…

Most critically, the playbook, people who have read it tell POLITICO, contained nothing about Donald Trump, who would spend the next excruciating year turning Bush into his personal patrician piñata.

“The rules all changed this year. It was all about taking on the establishment,” said a Republican operative close to the Bush family. “When you’re the son and brother of former presidents, the grandson of a U.S. senator, how do you run in a year like this? It is just a year of personality, not message. All of a sudden, there was no path for him. They just kept falling back on his record as governor, which is all he has—and no one gives a shit.”

Somehow Jeb and his Right to Rise SuperPAC managed to raise $150 million and literally accomplish nothing. It’s actually pretty astounding when you think about it.

The parallels for investors here are obvious so I won’t take much time spelling them out. Suffice it to say that having a strategy that works in one kind of environment is akin to making a big bet. And big bets either pay off spectacularly or fail spectacularly – and no matter what tactics you try to employ, it’s already too late if you’ve bet incorrectly.

Strategic asset allocation, which I am a firm believer in, is a bet that the environment will be unpredictable and subject to change without warning. With a long-term mandate in place, I don’t think there’s a more rational course of action available to investors.

Politico has the inside story on Team Jeb’s dreadful miscalculation.


Inside Jeb Bush’s $150 Million Failure (Politico)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. wigs commented on Jan 24

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2016/02/21/tactics-wont-matter-when-your-strategy-sucks/ […]