Chart o’ the Day: The (non) Velocity of Money

Why were the inflation hawks so wrong about quantitative easing? Why didn’t all the “money printing” lead to commodity prices skyrocketing?

One answer is that, while bank reserves were boosted, lending didn’t take off and there was no uptick in the velocity of money – the speed at which capital zooms through the economy and turns over. Absent velocity of money, QE could be looked at as either ineffective or actually causing a deflationary environment, where capital is hoarded and everyone is too petrified to risk it on productive endeavors.

Christopher Wood (CLSA) explains further in his new GREED & fear note:

To GREED & fear the best way to illustrate that quantitative easing is not working is the continuing decline in velocity and the resulting lack of a credit multiplier since the unorthodox monetary regime was introduced. In America, Japan and the Eurozone velocity has continued to decline since the financial crisis in 2008. Thus, US, Japan and Eurozone money velocity, measured as the nominal GDP to M2 ratio, has declined from 1.94x, 0.7x and 1.29x respectively in 1Q98 to 1.5x, 0.55x and 1.05x in 2Q15 (see Figure 3). Indeed, US money velocity is now at a six-decade low. This is why those who have predicted a surge in inflation in recent years caused by the Fed “printing money” have so far been proven wrong. For inflation, as defined by conventional economists like Bernanke in the narrow sense of consumer prices and the like, will not pick up unless the turnover of money increases. This is the problem with the narrow form of mechanical monetarism associated with the likes of American economist Milton Friedman.

Screen Shot 2015-10-08 at 11.32.34 AM

Wood goes on to make the point that QE is deflationary because it shrinks net interest margins for banks via depressing treasury bond yields. It also enriches the already wealthy via asset price inflation but they do not raise their consumption in response, because how much more shit can they possibly buy? Finally, it leads to a preference of share buybacks vs investment spending because the payback from financial engineering is so much easier and more immediate.


False Courage
CLSA – October 8th 2015

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. » “Когда закончится гегемония доллара?” | Инсайдер Блог commented on Oct 15

    […] Скорость обращения денег снижается: В США, Японии и Еврозоне М2 снизилось  до 1.5x, 0.55x и 1.05x- в Европе за счет “отрицательных процентных ставок”,то есть пожирания депозитов вкладчиков Chart o’ the Day: The (non) Velocity of Money […]

  2. Когда закончится гегемония доллара? | БЮДЖЕТЪ.РФ commented on Oct 16

    […] Понятно,что в условиях всеобщей безграмотности, идет естественный процесс снижения избыточной стоимости, что именуется «дефляцией»: Мировой фондовый рынок потерял в III квартале 2015 г. $11 трлн. Падение во всех крупных мировых экономиках сильно ударило по «бумажному богатству», и это был худший квартал для фондового рынка с 2011 г. Но инвесторам необходимо готовиться к тому, что самое страшное еще может быть впереди.Скорость обращения денег снижается: В США, Японии и Еврозоне М2 снизилось  до 1.5x, 0.55x и 1.05x- в Европе за счет «отрицательных процентных ставок»,то есть пожирания депозитов вкладчиков Chart o’ the Day: The (non) Velocity of Money […]

  3. Il triangolo no – Tokos SCF commented on Oct 13

    […] dal fatto che il denaro messo in circolazione in realtà circola molto meno di prima (vedi). Per dirla con Lewis Carroll, “Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep […]

  4. iwc replicas commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 78269 additional Info on that Topic: […]

  5. quality repair service commented on Nov 27

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: […]

  6. rolex imitacion commented on Jan 14

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More to that Topic: […]

  7. Regression Testing commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 79645 more Information to that Topic: […]

  8. Quality engineering commented on Jan 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: […]

  9. LG GR-B218JSFA manuals commented on Jan 21

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: […]

  10. wig commented on Jan 22

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here on that Topic: […]

  11. bmo login online commented on Jan 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 16035 more Info on that Topic: […]

  12. best fake watches commented on Jan 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: […]