The Bubble That Wouldn’t Blow

It’s possible the burgeoning tech bubble that was well underway in 2014 has gradually deflated itself down to a less threatening level without millions of aftermarket investors getting themselves bludgeoned in the process. A lot of the excesses may be in the process of wringing themselves out at the venture level, before mom & pop even have a chance to run head first into the brick wall of reality.

That’s cool, I guess.

Wall Street Journal:

Only 11% of U.S. IPOs so far in 2015 involved tech companies, according to new data from research firm Renaissance Capital. That is the lowest level since 2008, when the figure was 10% and the financial crisis was in full force. Meanwhile, shares in many of the companies that have gone public aren’t performing well.

The data send a strong signal that the broader markets aren’t eager to buy everything venture capitalists are selling, threatening the outlook for what has been one of the most robust segments of the U.S. investment landscape.

We may not end up with a full-fledged bubble this time around after all. Some fires snuff themselves out once they’ve eaten up all the remaining oxygen in the room, before they’ve had a chance to spread much farther and do real damage.

A down-cycle that only ratchets things down a bit in a small circle of founders and VCs is vastly preferable to a full-scale economy-crushing collapse, a la 2000-2002. We’ll take it.


IPO Market Continues Without Many Tech Companies (Wall Street Journal)


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. commented on Oct 19

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 47491 additional Information to that Topic: […]

  2. RPA Testing commented on Nov 12

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: […]

  3. replica swiss watches commented on Nov 25

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  4. Functional testing services commented on Nov 26

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: […]