The Keynesian Ugly Contest

John Maynard Keynes, one of the greatest investors of all time in addition to being a famous economist, liked to describe stock and bond speculation as a beauty pageant. But in the Keynesian beauty pageant, we’re not judging the beauty of the contestants themselves. Rather, we’re really judging the judges, and attempting to figure out which contestants the other judges will vote for. What, after all, is the price of a security if not a representation of what our fellow judges are willing to pay for it?

Which brings me to the talk of the markets these past few weeks: Lack of liquidity.

Jamie Dimon worries about liquidity in the bond market. So does Gary Cohn. So does Stephen Schwarzman. So does Nouriel Roubini. So do bond market participants in virtually every category, from munis to corporates to agencies to Treasurys. These judges, if you will, are concerned that because Wall Street has essentially become regulated out of proprietary trading in fixed income, that when bids are needed, they won’t be there. There is a fear that the new buyer of fixed income – the mutual fund, the ETF and the hedge fund – will jump out of the way as prices come down, thus creating a cascade or a shit spiral where people dump assets because they assume their competitors will also be dumping assets and they’d rather sell first than sell second or last.

That’s your Keynesian Ugly Contest at work – market participants stop paying attention to the bonds themselves, and start to sell today what they think their fellow judges will sell eventually.

Meanwhile, it’s worth pointing out, as Ben Carlson did last month, that there is always the threat of illiquidity. No one gets invested in an asset with any kind of guarantee about what the market will be like to sell into down the road. Even with a counterparty guaranteeing to buy it back from you, you’re still at risk of that counterparty being insolvent when the time comes.

It’s also worth pointing out that, so far, there is no actual liquidity problem in mainstream fixed income asset classes. Here’s Peter Boockvar on today’s Treasury auction, which went off without a hitch despite yields being at 9 month highs:

With yields at the highest level since October, the benchmark 10 yr note auction was very good as the yield of 2.461% was below the when issued of 2.47-.475% and the bid to cover ratio of 2.74 was a touch above the previous 12 month average of 2.68 and the highest since December. Also, direct and indirect bidders took a total of 70% of the auction vs the one year average of 63%.

Now of course, those are Treasurys, which will be one of the last things to face a liquidity problem. But every day corporate issuance goes off without a hitch precisely because of how much liquidity is spilling over from the sovereign bond markets into higher-yield debt. And while corporate yields are higher now than they were, there is no shortage of buyers – even if it takes a bit longer to match them than it did when the Fed was QEing everything in sight.

Howard Lutnick, CEO of BCG Partners (the old Cantor Fitzgerald), explained that while Wall Street banks have many fewer traders, those traders haven’t been vaporized, they’ve simply set up shop at smaller firms backed by hedge fund or private equity capital. “It’s the same people in the bond market, they just have different jobs.” Let’s hope he’s right – that the market is simply more fragmented these days and, as such, requires a bit more effort.

So while it’s good to maintain an awareness of the market’s liquidity concerns, it’s not like the TED Spread is blowing out or anything.

The bottom line?

If enough traders grow concerned with the concerns of other traders, they will surely end up causing the very thing they fear.

If enough people believe there could be a liquidity crisis, then there will be a liquidity crisis. 

But we’re not there yet.


Some reading:

People Are Worried About Bond Market Liquidity (BloombergView)

Why Is The ETF Market Preparing For A ‘Liquidity Crisis’ And A ‘Market Meltdown’? (ETF Daily News)

How the Next Financial Crisis Will Happen (WSJ)

The liquidity timebomb – monetary policies have created a dangerous paradox (Guardian)

Jamie Dimon: New crisis coming, regs will make it worse (CNNMoney)

Wall Street Bemoans Bond Market Liquidity Squeeze (MoneyBeat)

Liquidity Risk: Same as It Ever Was (A Wealth Of Common Sense)

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here:

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. Bitcoin Era Review commented on Oct 01

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: […]

  2. Eric Arnoux commented on Oct 09

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: […]