S&P 500 names with the largest off-balance sheet tax liabilities

Credit Suisse notes that the mountain of earnings being accumulated and hoarded overseas by US corporations is now over $2 trillion. Further, they get into a discussion about how a lot of S&P 500 companies to decline to provide a tax liability estimate for these overseas earnings when reporting to the SEC each quarter. They make the case that these earnings are indefinitely intended for overseas reinvestment and that it is “impractical” to make such a tax liability disclosure given the complexity of their foreign operations.

CS took a look at the S&P 500 companies whose off-balance sheet tax liabilities represent the largest portion of their respective market caps to get a sense of where the risk might be should companies need to repatriate more of their overseas cash to fund operations or buyback/dividend plans. The analysts conclude that many balance sheets are nowhere near as flexible as some may currently believe when this is factored in.

…only 69 companies out of the 310 in the S&P 500 (excluding REITs and companies domiciled outside the U.S.) that disclose how much in earnings they have parked overseas provide an estimate of the potential U.S. tax liability, which totaled $150 billion.

For the remaining 241 companies we assumed the residual taxes due in the U.S. would be 25% of the earnings parked overseas and estimate the total unrecognized/undisclosed deferred tax liability is $384 billion. Add that all up ($150 billion + $384 billion) and we estimate there’s a $533 billion (after rounding) off-balance-sheet U.S. tax liability tied to the $2.1 trillion in earnings parked overseas for the S&P 500 companies.

To get a sense for the magnitude of these off-balance-sheet U.S. tax liabilities, we compare them to the market cap for each company. We found 68 companies, where that potential tax liability was more than 5% of the market cap including the 14 companies in Exhibit 2, where it is more than 10%. Balance sheets might not be as healthy as they appear after factoring in this off-balance-sheet tax liability. Have you priced it in? If you’re expecting that the earnings really are reinvested overseas indefinitely then you might not have to, but if the company wants to put the funds to work in the U.S. or return cash to you the shareholder (or creditor) then you should.

Screen Shot 2015-03-17 at 9.28.34 AM

 

One additional risk here is the possibility that Obama’s proposed mandatory tax holiday goes through. The Cliff’s Note’s version of this proposal is that the US government would force repatriation at a rate of 14% – far below the normal corporate tax rate of around 35%, but mandatory nonetheless. CS does not believe this budget proposal will pass this year, but it’s still out there…

Source:

Parking A-Lot Overseas
Credit Suisse – March 17th 2015

This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media) reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Wealthcast Media, an affiliate of Ritholtz Wealth Management, receives payment from various entities for advertisements in affiliated podcasts, blogs and emails. Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. Investments in securities involve the risk of loss. For additional advertisement disclaimers see here: https://www.ritholtzwealth.com/advertising-disclaimers

Please see disclosures here.

What's been said:

Discussions found on the web
  1. immediate edge reviews commented on Sep 16

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/17/sp-500-names-with-the-largest-off-balance-sheet-tax-liabilities/ […]

  2. sex commented on Sep 18

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 52506 additional Info to that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/17/sp-500-names-with-the-largest-off-balance-sheet-tax-liabilities/ […]

  3. is blazing trader a scam? commented on Sep 28

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Info here on that Topic: thereformedbroker.com/2015/03/17/sp-500-names-with-the-largest-off-balance-sheet-tax-liabilities/ […]