Cash should be used as either an emergency fund outside of a portfolio (in a bank) or as a tactical position for those who choose to be tactical. But as a permanent sleeve of an asset allocation portfolio, we do not believe that cash makes sense. We tell clients to keep three to six months living expenses in cash on hand, but that anything beyond that is purely emotional or closet market-timing.
Over the last 24 hours, a huge disagreement has erupted between Adam Nash, founder of the Wealthfront roboadvisor, and the Charles Schwab Corporation, which has just unveiled a robo service of its own, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios.
At the heart of the argument is this: Schwab is making its service free to investors, with the caveat that it will be using its own smart beta ETFs (with what Adam calls higher internal expenses). More egregiously, in Adam’s view, is that Schwab will be allocating its clients assets into a high level of cash, which is where Schwab’s internal bank makes its real money. Nash says that these large cash positions that Schwab is building into its allocation will detract from the potential gains of young investors who, theoretically, have long time horizons and should be more heavily invested in stocks.
I’ll link to both Adam Nash’s original post at Medium below followed by the Schwab response – you can make your own decision. I side with Adam on this one – cash is cash, a portfolio is a portfolio. Both are essential for people, but ought not be conflated. Our own robo advisory, Liftoff, believes that investors should be invested and has its portfolios structured accordingly.
The real question is, if Schwab had no ability to earn money on its client cash balances, would it still be including allocations like these? Schwab makes the case that it would.
I’m a New York City-based financial advisor at Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. I help people invest and manage portfolios for them. For disclosure information please see here.
Get a Full Investor Curriculum: Join The Book List
Every month you'll receive 3-4 book suggestions--chosen by hand from more than 1,000 books. You'll also receive an extensive curriculum (books, articles, papers, videos) in PDF form right away.
RT @ReformedBroker: is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not?
http://t.co/IHoSu4U1Yg
RT @ReformedBroker: Is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not? http://t.co/aFEzkKUvY8
Josh @ReformedBroker weighs in on the wealthfront-schwab dispute of whether cash is an asset class
(Spoiler: No)
http://t.co/y3c5jqJSWO
RT @ReformedBroker: is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not?
http://t.co/IHoSu4U1Yg
I agree with @ReformedBroker on this: cash SHOULD NOT be a strategic allocation in your inaccessible retirement a/c: http://t.co/7e8UnqppoW
“I side with @adamnash on this one – cash is cash, a portfolio is a portfolio.” – @ReformedBroker http://t.co/O10Q2LWg0t
RT @ReformedBroker: is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not?
http://t.co/IHoSu4U1Yg
[…] WaitWhat: Is Cash An Investable Asset Class Or Not? […]
Is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not? by @ReformedBroker http://t.co/5YPtJaKRu7
RT @ReformedBroker: Is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not? http://t.co/aFEzkKUvY8
RT @ReformedBroker: is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not?
http://t.co/IHoSu4U1Yg
RT @ReformedBroker: Is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not? http://t.co/aFEzkKUvY8
Is Cash an Investable Asset Class or Not? by @ReformedBroker http://t.co/DPtOOZG7kY
I’m with @ReformedBroker on this one; cash is not an asset class. http://t.co/NAuxNWy8QS
[…] Is cash an asset class? (thereformedbroker) […]